100 karma · joined May 27, 2008
I've got 244 DVDs in my queue and I've rated 1496 so far. I don't seem to have any of the problems that the author seems to have.
Their recommendation system is far better than I've seen in any field and it is incredibly accurate in my experience. The UI hasn't updated much, but it has updated. It really doesn't need to. You find movies via the recommendations made on _every single page_ or you find movies by following a particular director or actor to their page. It is a very easy site to navigate and use. I have no idea why the author seems to have such a hard time with it.
that's why... GUI objects that have intrinsic knowledge of networking are actually really powerful and useful.
And you're right, I don't come here for humor or jokes or any other bullshit. I come here because the name is "hacker news" and thus far, it has done a pretty good job of living up to both words in that name. The reason I come here is 80% for the comments, 20% for the actual links. I learn more from the comments than I do from most of the articles and I'd like to keep it that way. I go elsewhere for humor, and I don't want to spend my time sorting the two out here. Is that asking for too much?
I see now in the guidelines that my original comment is frowned upon. I only have a 56 karma currently so I apparently don't meet the threshold for downvoting/flagging (I'm more of a gatherer/reader than a karmawhore) so this is all I've got available as a tool to shape things. So, I retract my request and I'll go back to lurking and if/when the signal:noise ratio goes to shit I'll go looking for something else (tho, HN does seem to be the last resort for good S:N so my hopes aren't too high).
I'd prefer YC's comments not go the way of Digg or Reddit.
I find it immaterial considering the easier thing to speed up is the number of HTTP requests on the site, and that has clearly gotten worse over the years, not better. I pushed heavily to get HTML cleaned up and valid (showing an easy 10-20% reduction with HTML alone), reduce the amount of javascript, etc. It simply wasn't a priority. To be fair, at the time I was there the priority was to grow as fast as possible and deal with profits later.
Here in Seattle I've been held up for over an hour on the 520 bridge because of an accident THE OTHER DIRECTION. Having screens would prevent rubber necking on the other side of the highway (with a large cement barrier in between).
Also, I think you can do a lot to the screen itself to increase driver safety. Make it 15' high and entirely yellow/black diagonal stripes and it'll catch driver's attention and get them to slow down. TV and radio educational ads can help too.
Instead, stupid granny pictures. Welcome to the internet, here is the first of an endless supply of stupid.
Hoff's point was well above that, at the design/macro level. For that I alternate releases between adding features and house cleaning (bug fixes, refactorings, etc). With a sufficiently short iteration time, you can appease both the client/users with new features and the developers by keeping things clean and happy.
I will say tho, that there is still value in owning these books in paper. I swear it makes a difference in readability, comprehension, etc. I can vaguely remember something, open the book, and flip very close to it most of the time.
The blue book is one of the best computer books I own, hands down. I will always cherish it.
"No, we shouldn't add an offshore team to meet our deadline, and here's why..."
now I use deja vu sans, which is a fork of bitstream vera sans with full unicode.
I saw in one of Ian Piumarta's talks that OSX has considerably more lines of code than vista. Kinda surprises me, kinda doesn't.
I prefer the shotgun approach. In the last 6 months: 22 releases across 8 projects (with differing levels of inter-relatedness). I've worked on 19 other projects in that period of time (this number might be low as I polled the filesystem, not perforce).
wrong: macports or fink.
wrong: apropos apropos: apropos(1) - search the whatis database for strings
wrong: gcc -v: gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465)
Maybe you could actually TRY things before you make completely false claims that you haven't bothered to test... There is nothing "fussy" about it... I don't even really know what that means. 10.5 ships with xcode just like (pretty much) all the iterations before it. I think 10.0 was the only one to not include it.I find myself cursing any editor that is moded. Moded editing is simply wrong. That said, I doubt there is any movement command in vi that is missing from emacs. The editors are the same in basic text-editing functionality. They differ drastically in philosophy and extended functionality.
Actually I'm competent in vi, so I can pair with others, but man I don't like it.
Squeak and the other smalltalks pretty much all have precise GCs. I'm not as familiar with the GC systems in the lisps, but I'd guess that they're all precise because the memory structures are so damn simple/clean. It is the scripting languages that start to fall down. Perl used reference counting for years, prolly still does; same with python. Ruby has a mark/sweep conservative. But hey, they work well enough. shrug