1,461 karma · joined April 22, 2015
That information may alter your perception of the primary resource.
If you don't like foreign markets, don't enter them.
Again with monero because it's pertinent to your point, I would encourage you to read up on its design goals, and the discussions around the recent PoW algo change on github or Reddit.
Traditional cloud platform providers are also in a position to impact mining on those. I doubt that any coin could cope with those warehouses of potential mining power.
I'm looking closely at monero on this subject. Despite or because of their hardcore emphasis on privacy, that project has made interesting decisions regarding how to deal with potentially hostile miners.
Disclaimer: Yep, you guessed it, I hold coins, and monero is among them. I'm not saying buy XMR, but definitely take a look at their "politics".
What makes you apparently think
1) the current state of affairs is good enough coming from anyone in the BigCorp top10, particularily those already involved un data collection as core business?
2) future iterations on any of [hardware, software, business goals] will be conform to currently reasonable expectation of use from the general public ?
I mean we're talking about a corp that has internalised "Bait and Switch" as core business model..
And I didn't mean illusory in opposition to real. Is the pleasure I derive from an illusory steak in the Matrix not real?
Could you give some pointers for further reading on the subject please?
Basically an ARM(v8 64b) desktop-like experience in a phone sized chassis.
>"I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't vend that to you. Would you like a Dr. Pepper or Pepsi instead?"
I realise this was humour, but you framed the problem as I see it perfectly. I don't feel safe if I don't know Hal's code, especially if he's talking to all the other Hal's (be they other vending machines or information aggregating corporations). And what are the odds that these things will be open source?
I'm going with the "be famous or be afraid" school of thought of your parent comment.
(Edit) See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=pr0gramm pr0 "official statement" https://img.pr0gramm.com/2018/03/26/6300254f309e8f69.png
I should add that I am not affiliated with anyone here, just a user of that board.
Source?
The question as I understand it is whether the surplus production/exports are worth not scaling slightly back on the extensive farming.
Either diversifying production, letting a part of the area to fallow or splitting large "strictly for profit" farms into distinct units would have many benefits ecologically and possibly even help revitalise the rural towns.
I'd argue it's a shield against unfair competition. US tech companies have a huge first mover advantage. They use that advantage to attract foreign talent and employ that talent to extract value globally. It seems reasonable to expect a financial contribution for access to foreign markets given the quasi monopolistic quality of US tech firms.