>this is not a sustainable strategy for creating a stable synthetic asset
Could you give some pointers for further reading on the subject please?
Could you give some pointers for further reading on the subject please?
For other history on synthetic assets, read Preston's posts and also Vitalik's posts such as https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/03/28/schellingcoin-a-minimal...
For ether, such overcollateralization isn't a problem, because you can package it as an ether derivative and have no counterparty risk... But for a gold collateral you would have a risk that cannot be mitigated in this way and the risk will need to increase the slippage of the asset.