704 karma · joined October 6, 2015
Not according to the judge.
You may say they were rightful, and many people are discussing it.
But at the same time you have to understand that a person trained and appointed to determine if the reasons are rightful, said they are not.
That's were the story started to have two sides.
No wonder people rightfully remind there's another side.
However, a first step would be imposing FB to expose all features and user data using an open protocol to be defined.
That would be a good thing on its own, given that it would make possible for other networks to federate with Facebook. (And when you think about it, it's much closer to the usual Internet, think of SMTP, BGP... A monolithic service like FB is actually the exception!)
Moreover, it would set the ground for splitting Facebook into two (or possibily more) federated networks.
For instance GTK apps in the earlies 2000s were easily displaying content as rich.
Slack could easily use native widgets, without embedding any HTML.
I think that's the rationale: you are supposed to explain what you do, not how you do it. The function is short enough that a global comment is enough.
I agree with you, that a couple of comments in the function body wouldn't have hurt.
You can be declared guilty by preponderance of evidence, of course, but still you are innocent until proven guilty.
I think that we can just try to be humans and ask, it's not really a big deal. As I said even eye contact is enough most often, is it so difficult.
There's no need to start a war, leave along a pointless, sexist war like the proponents of the term "manspreading" are doing.
atexit (close_stdout);
Aren't all streams closed at exit? And why closing stdout, anyway?
And btw yes, the problem, as it is described by the sexist slur "manspreading", exists just in a feminist's mind.
In my experience men and women are equally represented among assholes. I'm glad you shared your different personal experience, though.
#ACE71C is quite acetic, on the other hand.
It looks to me a lot about the story that if you run, you'll sweat. If you sweat, you'll take a cold. If you take a cold, you'll sneeze. If you sneeze, you'll catch pneumonia. And if you catch pneumonia you'll die. So don't run.
On the other hand I saw my fair share of jackasses on public transportation (feet over a seat, bringing in bikes during peak hours when it is explicitly forbidden, screaming on phone, drinking beer and then throwing the can on the floor, occupying more than one seat) and -- surprise surprise -- males and females were equally represented among jackasses.
This feminist trend of making up problems and sticking a "male" label on it really makes me sick!
That said, I think that the same bracket on electric cars is a truly draconian measure.
On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
Probably people don't find their intellectual curiosity gratified by the umpteenth post about Trump. Also consider that many users are not American.
Let me show that with a simple example.
Some women are always complaining and whining. You have to find a word for this behaviour. If you choose a word (femmwhining, maybe?) that implies that all women are always complaining and whining, then you are being sexist.
Clearly I was wrong, and I spent the last hour playing with D!
Many thanks for your advice!
The closer I got is Rust, but I really hate the borrow system, I suppose I could program in unsafe Rust.
The alternative is C++, which feels too broad and complex, so I am sticking to C.