ypeterholmes

Think about typing the character ‘a’ on a keyboard. Fast, right? Just the one keystroke. “It is fast,” Bathiche says, “if you make some certain assumptions. That the position of the letter ‘a’ is where you intended it to be, the font is the way you intended it to be, the size of the ‘a’ is what you intended it to be.” All those decisions are made before you hit the key, and you often don’t have a choice. “But with ink, you can dictate all those things, almost simultaneously as you’re writing. I can put my ‘a’ here, or here, and I can make it as big as I want, as hard as I want.”

I can type wayyy faster than I can write with a pen.

So... yeah

Not for long. Years from now living without a backup of yourself will be as abhorrent as currently operating a database with no backup.

This is already the case. Except this solution eliminates a lot of the existing opportunities for corruption by generally simplifying the model.

> There will absolutely be people who abuse the system and use this money to not cover their required expenses and use it for a variety of things they don't need.

It's a thousand bucks- pretty hard to live large on 1k. Besides, comparing the issue of poor people abusing handouts to corporate welfare is molehills to mountains. If your concern is abuse having a detrimental impact on the society as a whole, don't look at poor people.

As to whether this global power structure is deliberate or emergent, I think my essay makes it quite clear that it's the former. Looking only at the link you provided, I can see how one might ask that question. But after examining the origins of the globalist power and the synchronicity of their operations, making the emergent argument gets pretty difficult.

I think I've summed it up nicely in my essay the monopoly: http://www.lettersfrompeter.com/the-monopoly/

Picks up right where he leaves off.

There's a critical piece missing in these discussions- the global banking cartel that has corrupted all of our political and social institutions. Until their agenda and activities are included in the scope of our analysis, things will just keep getting worse.

hahaha who? Is your client Stephen Hawking?

This is wrong. From Copernicus to Einstein to many others, agreeing with the "mainstream" has very little to do with science.

*edit. I see now that it's just twitter and the contact that leave. Not bad.

And I shall tweet them letting em know.