yieldcrv

this doesn't seem bad, there are other missions greenlit from the same budget

10 years of believing your color coded wave of choice is going to happen and still winding up with a 50-50 senate

the seats necessary to alter that aren't even open, how gullible do people have to be? well, not very, independents are the largest bloc now, but of the remaining partisans... hello? your algorithm is fake

Tool calling solves this

great initiative, it's really weird seeing efficiencies get rediscovered in the LLM audience, because these efficiencies aren't even what I would consider to be old

but I guess they are

> the boundary between "I like this" and "I've seen enough people liking this that I now think I like this" gets blurry

Burning Man has a lot of things I’ve never seen before that I wind up liking without anyone else’s validation

Most of that experience is still different than what gets posted online about that experience

If you’re looking for what this article is talking about, it’s there

the onchain version of polymarket seems better in this regard, but they should really address the UMA oracle gang and have some kind of appointment process for separate oracle systems

so both polymarket onchain and polymarket us have major issues, but separate issues

hell yeah, based

Hi, September 2026, meet September 2025

taking the Apple strategy with the Apple ecosystem, genius

doesn’t this affirm an existing ruling in a different appeals circuit or the Supreme Court?

so then what I’m really interested in are benchmarks of OSS models vs closed source frontier models, using Claude Code as a harness

Our entire world is about reducing the friction of conducting a transaction

How to fix the lack of trust which is needed to conduct a transaction

Contracts affix a moment of trust in time, so even when trust is lost between parties the contract has guardrails for behavior and consequences for acting outside those rails

There are many transactions that are completely inaccessible to most people because the need for a contract or lawyer is too high

LLM use allows for those inaccessible transactions to decrease, and get people further along to the point where a lawyer is accessible as well, and economically viable to use

"The goal of this website is to spread the amazing actions, feats, and words of the men and women currently aboard the International Space Station."

It is so easy for me to separate the art from the artists, study me

Legally obtained bitcoin is what the person I responded to said, suggesting anti money laundering concerns which are the concerns I responded to

And the tax liability sister comments all disagree with each other

Notably, the parent commenter hasn’t replied at all yet

Something that takes 5 seconds with bitcoin, faster than any other property type, is something you rationalize as taking 7 years

Why does HN collectively tolerate this level of understanding when it comes to crypto

The keyboard in iOS since 18

> While mice with brains that are partly human might sound like a Kafkaesque experiment, the scientists said these are not "mice that think like humans".

oh, thank god

Before OpenAI dropped ChatGPT, nobody knew chat would be such a hit. Several labs had versions of these things, Google engineers were getting finessed by a rudimentary model just like in the movie Ex Machina that came out 10 years prior which was satirizing Google

But I don't agree that they aren't product-ized. There are many applications doing calls to LLMs behind the scenes and are hits, leveraging structured data very heavily and not having conversations with users at all. I would say that there is a predictable scope creep from executives to surface a conversational aspect though. We need to bring representation to that so we can point to some other best practice to push back

I love this

Claude's mobile app wouldn't show any Cowork initiated conversations, even if those conversations didn't leverage cowork specific features

Its not for you, its advertisement, to preemptively avoid both consumer and securities fraud accusations, and for their enterprise client’s IT security review and SLAs

I have a shared understanding for what you're asking, but semantic versioning doesn't even make sense for AI models

these are essentially monthly releases, the dated releases that Deepseek and Qwen do make more sense

so what? put an LLM on Cerebras and get its responses faster, and put Jev on Cerebras and gets its responses even faster

this is interesting, so not an LLM but can be used in these use cases that LLM's have been shoehorned into

https://docs.typesafe.ai/concepts/use-case-map

oooooh it can play Doom!

forget LLM benchmaxxing sidequests, I'm sold on the real benchmark

Oura Ring 5 has solved all my issues with prior versions

adding representation to the silent non-bothered audience, I like the scroll effect here and don't find it terrible

hastily adding AI in into the mix will make things worse

its good to be skeptical, better to spur competition and address any limitations to competition functioning quickly

Update: IOS 27 fixed it

(while IOS 26.7 did not)

the only reason there is compute availability is because devs hate Oracle so much that they don't know about it

an LLM told me about that option when I was seeking out free tiers

signin wall so can’t read, but doesn’t sound like what I’m referring to