112 karma · joined April 21, 2022
If articles are more efficient, then it means there are plenty of nonsense in books. I don't think good books are filled with a lot of nonsense, if they are, then they are not good.
However, it's a fact that there are a lot of books which are collections of many trivial topics, collections of unrelated articles.
Here is another raft implementation in Go https://github.com/eliben/raft
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/04/science/for-sympathetic-e...
But I think people should choose topic carefully it should be fundamental, maybe it's soon unfortunately gone if you choose a trendy and short-lived tech.
You have to read code and debug it that is inevitable, you can't say that there will not be any bugs if you use voice instead of writing.
Even though now speech recognition rate is really high, but I wonder how many authors use speech to write articles. The comparison may make sense. And I think there's few.