3,409 karma · joined June 8, 2009
I had the same excitement as the author when Google Books came out. The service has stagnated over the years. Reading snippets is such a frustrating experience (you cannot even cut and paste the text). Even the books where one can buy an ebook is not available for some countries. Many times it is quicker to search on archive.org to find related books digitized by Microsoft.
We still have a long way to go where knowledge can be distributed at low cost and in abundance ...
TeX and friends has adapted over the years through external tooling, without changes to the core, for example moving from postscript to pdf, the new engines XeLaTeX and LuaTeX. Madoko is just a preprocessor for LaTeX. If you had to finally do some changes to the LaTeX code it produces it will be very difficult as this LaTeX code is not very clean. Having said this though Madoko and similar projects are great for the LaTeX community, as an entry point to newcomers and to occassional users. It is a great Project especially as is written in Koka in itself a beautiful Project.
I always liked this piece, as it fits with me being able to be alone for days on end, without missing anyone's company.
Personally, I am of the opinion that the original TeX was well 'modularized' in 'Pascal Procedures' [1], being Turing complete, extensions such as the LaTeX format and the countless of packages after that helped it survive and prosper. Think of a macro that you define as an easier way than programming a module in JavaScript and it doesn't need a half a dozen tools to set it up.
\def\#1{\TeX\ is alive says #1.}
Nevertheless, provided the lessons learned are incorporated I applaud any new initiatives in more modern languages. Whatever is produced will however, need to be able to parse TeX, otherwise it will not be easily adopted by the community.[1] http://www.tug.org/texlive//devsrc/Master/texmf-dist/doc/gen...
If there is a legal way for example for an employee that pays $10,000 in tax to employ someone at $10,000 and save that money then for each tax-payer a new job is being created. This can be for example be channeled via a non-profit (which scales via software) which would legally employ the individuals assign tasks to the individuals, provide training (which can employ trainers) help in seed money etc., basic health care and other similar services.
Another counter-intuitive idea, is to target high worth individuals, rather than low end individuals. Thousands of people are in jobs and interested in getting out of them to start a business. A Job + investment scheme in businesses that need financing might or might not work, but worth thinking. This keeps the individual employed and if the business expands would probably create another 2-5 jobs easily.
Franchising as a co-op rather than sending money to the mother ship, can easily scale in many sectors.
I think this is the greatest RFS ever and wish it success from the bottom of my heart. If no single scheme can achieve it, maybe 100 schemes can. It is not impossible.
CSS did borrow concepts from TeX at the time. I agree with you that if it had borrowed more from TeX maybe we would have avoided Javascript and also we would have benefited from an updated model for TeX and I said so at http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/6463/963.
Maybe is time to revisit and revamp both.