252 karma · joined April 5, 2016
I also remember my typical cynicism (held to myself of course) when he described the idea (what's this, Excel for ipads??!).. But now with a $1.1B valuation, wow - so well done to him and his team!
I would also assume by the time millenials are grampas nobody is gonna be looking at screens but through some AR glasses/lenses
Works such as the Republic are a bit too heavyweight / scholarly for me..
Though I am currently on a low-carb diet for weight control, the times I remember me being the most productive were when I was eating tons of simple carbs and junk food.
In fact the most productive people I've met, if you look at their desks they are full of muffin, candy and energy drink leftovers. They must consume tons of sugar per day, and they output work like a damn machine.
I have friends who are potheads and they swear that everyone smokes weed and everyone who's ever done something meaningful in their life is because of marijuana.
Not everyone does drugs, and not everyone works best with them, it's not normal, it's not enhancement.
In all their talks, the pattern was always the same: 1) take a dataset from some random system, and strip it from all its domain context ("interdisciplinary" research) 2) brag about being a "physicist" thus applying a "physicist's" approach to new areas of research 3) plot data on log-log scale - kind of looks like a power law 4) make a toy model and use it to "simulate the system" 5) plot simulation vs real data on log-log scale -- kinda look the same 6) promise that your trivial little model will reveal whole new horizons for that field you know nothing about - because others are stupid and you're a "physicist" 7) write a grant proposal
This might be correct if you take a 3rd-person perspective view, but ignores human agency and the ability to steer situations - sometimes via sheer willpower.
See Paul Graham's essay on Intellect vs. Determination.
it is amazing how similar those "respectable" metropolitan left-wing newspapers are to their populist-right counterparts:
for the latter "immigrants are gonna take your jobs and globalists are evil" and the former "robots are gonna take your jobs and techies are evil".
Currently departments are pressing researchers towards output rather than long-term quality work - at least that was the key aspect of my post-doctoral experience.
From my experience, for some reason PhD advisors tend to work well/really like mature students. No hard data on this, just an empirical observation across 3-4 labs I've worked in before I left academia.
With regards to career prospects (outside academia ofc), you definitely gain respect but anything more than that largely depends on your area of research. Which one is it, if I may ask?
Then you have to write other documents (grant proposals) to grab money to write more documents (papers) by gaming the inner mechanics of some comittee.
If partner-track investment bankers are overworked, depressed sociopaths with Lamborghinis, then tenure-track postdocs are investment bankers with crappy bicycles.
Needless to say, I left academia 3 years ago and never looked back.
Far less distractions too.
So interesting how puritanism evolves