1,976 karma · joined May 14, 2007
Great to see the spirit of curiosity and intellect alive in the most unlikely of circumstances.
"5. Why? - I have not been maintaining my car according to the recommended service schedule. (fifth why, a root cause)"
6. Why? - Because I didn't think it a high priority relative to my other activities
7. Why? - Because ...
1. The research result that a small amount of offtime, e.g. "In the Boston Consulting study ... guarantee each consultant one uninterrupted evening free each week", "can yield unexpected on-the-job benefits"
and
2. Examples of employees taking much longer times off, e.g. "staffers are expected to leave in time for dinner" (presumably every work day, and probably only 5 work days per week), and ""wellness scorecards" to track whether employees are working too much overtime"
Without diminishing the importance of prioritisation, the article doesn't reveal anything about offtime any longer than a very limited "one uninterrupted evening free each week".
In this case, the intro para just became less specific.
I think that live feedback from an audience is more important: In a lecture you can relatively easily gauge audience interest and comprehension of details, so you get rapid feedback about the audience demand for the focus and degree of details.
Note also PG's typo ("Rogers" should be "Rodgers") which slightly hinders searching.
So this only works with 50% occupancy? 120/(40*(3+3))