69 karma · joined September 9, 2012
I'd say yes and yes.
That is the argument I am making.
At worst, all they have to do is download a new copy of mount and presto, they have a new license.
[err, that's for gpl2. gpl3 has a more complicated termination procedure.]
ok, so in light of gpl3, they just need to go back and get a gpl2 copy of mount. It's not like mount has changed all that much, I'm sure the 2007 version will suffice. Or they could just write their own. How many lines of code are we talking about here?
And non presidential election turnout is abysmal.
m_prevLink->m_nextNode = m_nextNode;
I don't see where m_prevLink is changed. If the previous link has gone away, and you call RemoveFromList on this node a second time, it's going to chase that pointer.Also, it doesn't appear the provided code gracefully handles removing an item from a list twice.
For the most part, since it costs real money to send real mail, many of the people behind it are inclined to honor unsubscribe requests.