1,790 karma · joined January 20, 2014
> reduces the uncertainty in one observable by increasing the uncertainty in the other observable
Seems like you’re both saying the same thing with different wording
Ahh, I was imagining a Final Destination scenario
Ehhh you lost me there with that anti-player talking point parroted by the billionaire owners of the league. The players are part of a union, and their CBA says they get 48.8% of league revenue, while the owners get 51.2%.
But somehow people just latch onto “players salaries are too high”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_collective_bargaining_ag...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/01/judge-blocks-penguin-random-...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_purchase_of_T-Mobi...
From memory all these bodies were supposed to be “perfect and unblemished” or some such:
- lunar surface was textured
- Venus appeared as a crescent
- Jupiter had its own moons
- Saturn had “ears” (aperture was too small to resolve rings)
- Sun had spots
https://www.theverge.com/2022/8/25/23321553/tesla-takedown-v...
This is the premise of about half of I Think You Should Leave skits
I feel like this is the punchline to a great doctor joke but just needs a setup
Also in general I don’t believe you can get a mortgage without home insurance? So people buying these properties would have to come in cash.
Pubic comb, only used when needed to brush the lice and crabs out
“This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it.” - Admiral Josh Painter (Fred Thompson) The Hunt For Red October