Re: laggy. I know... 1.0 introduced new features but also inefficiencies. The cost of working on something solo. Releasing a patch soon.
280 karma · joined April 15, 2021
Re: laggy. I know... 1.0 introduced new features but also inefficiencies. The cost of working on something solo. Releasing a patch soon.
I'm not saying Tony did either -- I haven't followed along -- but certainly a lot of people do. I can't fully blame the people who do, though.
Anyway. The project I've built [1] is still going, and I feel proud of it on merits of software: that it pushes the bounds, however slightly; that it feels good to exist in the world; and that I genuinely care for the people using it.
All that's to say: I think there's a software solopreneur path that doesn't involve excessive hype, gross self-promotion (some degree of self-branding is necessary though), while allowing you to work by principles and also explore interesting software problems.
Feel free to DM me [2] if you have questions, or are interested in bootstrapping your own project. Especially consumer-facing. I do have some writing online [3] that covers this too.
---
[1] https://mmm.page
Long term dream is to have the HTML output look good enough that people can edit at both WYSIWYG and code levels.
I recently created a newsletter [1] to write and experiment more a la "An Internet Canvas." Feel free to give it a read.
You can also find me on Twitter [2], and support my project via patronships [3].
Oh, and go explore all the other sites people have made [4].
[1] https://woolgather.sh/issue/1
[2] https://twitter.com/xhfloz
As for fonts — it’s unideal! Those initial fonts are actually just the glyphs subset of fonts so I can display their names in the font picker. It’s already somewhat cut down by separating the fonts into basic and all, as well as delaying the load a few seconds after initial load, but still a lot to fix up there.
As to charging an (optional) paid plan, unfortunately, I have been bootstrapping this full-time the past few years, and because I can’t till my own land anymore, have to find the least terrible way of exchanging labor for money, such that I can pay for food and bills.
That being said, there is a free tier for this very reason, as I remember all the free services that got me started initially. Hoping to make this tier more generous once the project is profitable.
Let me know if you have other ideas. If I can (a) pay for business costs (accounting, APIs, hosting, etc), (b) pay for my bills, (c) attain a and b w/ incentives that align with my users and the principles of the project — I am all ears.
(But due to some iFrame hackiness, it doesn’t work in incognito.)
So if you enjoy the project, or want to support some of the researchy aspects of it, please consider upgrading!
I have another article in the works about the importance of independent funding models and slow growth incentives w/r/t organic social networks, and projects that necessarily require slow exploration as a community (not, in contrast, “spaces designed by committee”).
Also: a StumbleUpon-like explore experience of pages created using mmm.page [3].
[1] https://twitter.com/xhfloz/status/1653740562648821760?s=46
[2] https://twitter.com/xhfloz/status/1631746024120221698?s=46
That being said, I have my thoughts on nostalgia-mining [1], and in short, believe that a more interesting visual culture today requires a more contemporary approach.
For example, one of my favorite pages is a page of hand-drawn comics combined with GIFs made by a kid [2], another is a cleverly-designed page on "soft tech" [3]. Here is an illustrative thread comparing link-in-bios and mmm.page sites made by the same person -- it's surprising how much tools can limit our self-expression [4].
Personally, I get excited when I see these examples -- a departure from the grid-confines of contemporary web design. In theory, nothing about "letting people create pages with as much freedom as possible" intrinsically = "90s web with blinking GIFs all over".
Let me know if you have any other questions.
[1] https://twitter.com/xhfloz/status/1631746051295117313
[2] https://littlebookfair.mmm.page/oneoneone
Excited to see where this project goes.
They're meant to be pages for very easy combinations of text, mixed media, embeds, etc. — let more people create fun/interesting places on the internet. [2]
I started working on mmm.page in Feb 2021, and launched it that May on Hacker News [3], then it hit $2k/mo last year, and has been growing steadily since. There are roughly 30,000+ users at the moment. Revenue has been trickier for this project because it's a SaaS aimed at consumers, who are more price sensitive — but the flip-side is I love working with all the people who use the platforms. Just today, someone shared this moodboard that captured exactly how I've been thinking about it mmm.page [4]. Some other fun examples here [5]. I'm planning a second launch in May. Hopefully some good news to share there.
One note: it's a website, and most people edit it on desktop, but a surprising # of users convert /after/ trying it on mobile. I also found the conversion rate increased significantly after I made the homepage itself editable — thereby demo'ing the product without a login. Just a small note.
Anyway, feel free to reply or DM on Twitter if you have questions — especially re: solo bootstrapping "fun" consumer products that are trying to also become self-sustainable.
[1] https://mmm.page
[2] https://twitter.com/xhfloz/status/1631746024120221698
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27128424
A few other notes.
1. I don't think the point of design and color and a rich visual culture is just to be "not boring" and "erratic" and look at me! I'm so random! It's closer to why we appreciate public art installations, beautiful architecture, well-designed parks. So on. If we spend a large chunk of our lives online -- whether or not that is good, is a separate discussion -- then I believe we should care a great deal about how that space is presented. Whether we feel it's inhabited by other people, instead of mega-corps -- is important. Imagine if the real world became just a super-sized mega-mall.
2. We absolutely /should/ focus on the list of concerns you mentioned. I don't think it's either/or though (I'm happy to hear arguments for why they're mutually exclusive). I am, as part of mmm.page, working on a few things that will help people create private spaces just for their friends.
Let me know if that addresses your concerns.