I was recently watching some courses on AWS, I passed the actual exam but I only watched a few videos where things were a bit ambiguous for me.
So the completion metric is not very useful or accurate IMO.
Define production and define HTTP3. The beauty of open source is that you can be already serving pages using QUIC and TLS1.3 while the standard is being finalised.
I think you got it backwards. A relational schema change is required and probably a data reindex or reload when you change a data model so relational is the least flexible as opposed to something like Mongo nosql?
Google fixing vulnerabilities even before the release can only be good news, but one does have to be wonder why a whole class of such vulnerabilities are even allowed after so many releases?
Justyna yesterday I was complaining about GitHub monoculture in the context of Atlassian sunsetting Mercurial.
Outages like this are normal, but the problem is lack of good competitors.
Obviously this article shows up when the negative rates are already here, with the benefit of hindsight.
What I am more interested in at this point is what is a good, safe alternative for a small time investor who’s already overweight on equities and housing.
Bonds used to be the sensible pillar that worked at times when stock market crashed and now it doesn’t really make sense to use them for a small guy.
This point to an actual use of the cryptocurrency - exploiting a 0 day against someone who might have a crypto wallet means you can actually directly make money off exploits.
Prior to crypto, having a 0 day wasn't equal with ability to make blackhat money with it...
Why would people not buy extra properties with these mortgages “just in case”?
Especially the 10 year one seems low risk and worst case you have a property after 10 years?
What I find particularly troubling about the design of tokamak reactors is that on one hand you have magnets that need to be cooled to -250C or whatever the “high” temperature is nowadays and in the middle of it you have plasma that will leak thermal radiation in any way possible.
The magnets themselves will heat up from running large electric currents through them.
This just feels like a recipe for a disaster - if things suddenly stop working, due to heat or otherwise you have a very hot, radioactive plasma trying to equalise its energy with the outer world...
It's a bit like this: if the pay is too low, you make the jump to get the money.
If the money is good, you wait a few years and make a jump anyway because hopefully by then you've saved enough to be set for life (assuming normal pay elsewhere)
There’d be almost the same amount of electronics just sitting in Google’s servers.
People don’t game 24/7 but if Google want to provision for peak loads like Christmas they can’t really get away with having less?
Even with paying the accountant and even if the higher bracket was 90% you’d still be making more by earning more. It’s hard to agree with your line of thinking but I have seen this often that people are willing to sacrifice quite a lot of money for “security” and “peace of mind”.
In practice you’d have more peace of mind with more money in the bank.
we may have plateaued by now, but so far it's still a net gain - a new person comes in, learns things, often by reverse engineering, often improves the automated process, sometimes leaves etc.
But what we do need is a better way to measure automation gains and losses - basically any process that is automated shows up as a net loss in human productivity, which is simply not true.
And vice versa any automated processes probably don't account correctly for the total energy and resource use and the cost of maintenance (both software and hardware).
"$4 per TB/month" so 16 X 12 = $192+tax not a insignificant amount even in a first world country and probably a deal breaker for people living in poorer countries.