wwwlouishinofun

Now I know what Gaussian scattering is.

It hasn't been long since this happened The price hasn't been rising all year For d4 it's June, d5 is September so what happens

sam是终于明白色情是人类第一生产力了吗

Tell me a reason why you gave up Chrome

The pleasure of sexual activity is not strongly linked to pregnancy. This kind of human intervention was unexpected in the evolution of nature.

Summary of online discussions on Apple mouse design flaws Based on the provided information, many online users have engaged in heated discussions about the design flaws of Apple's mouse, particularly in terms of the charging port location, ergonomics, and functionality. Many believe that the design of the Apple mouse is seriously flawed and not worth buying. Charging port location issues: ● Many users expressed strong dissatisfaction with the Apple mouse's charging port being placed at the bottom, considering this design to be extremely impractical. ● They point out that users cannot continue to use the mouse when it needs to be charged, which causes significant inconvenience in the workflow. ● Although some users believe that the charging frequency is not high and the charging speed is fast, others say that the battery low prompts are not timely, often leading to work interruptions. ● Some users believe that Apple should move the charging port to the front of the mouse so that users can use it while charging. ● However, some users point out that the front of the Magic Mouse is very thin and may not have enough space to accommodate a charging port. Ergonomic issues: ● Many users criticize the poor ergonomic design of the Apple mouse, arguing that prolonged use can cause wrist pain. ● They believe that compared to other ergonomically designed mice, the Apple mouse's low profile and lack of side buttons make it difficult for users to comfortably grip and operate. ● Some users suggest that Apple offer other ergonomic mouse options to meet the needs of different users. Functionality issues: ● Some users criticize the Apple mouse for its lack of a physical scroll wheel and right-click function, arguing that this limits its functionality and practicality. ● They point out that in some cases, such as gaming or applications that require precise operation, a physical scroll wheel and right-click are essential. ● Although the Apple mouse supports multi-touch gestures, some users find these gestures unintuitive, prone to accidental touches, and may even lead to repetitive strain injuries. Other opinions: ● Some users believe that the sleek design of the Apple mouse is its main selling point, which may be enough to compensate for its functional shortcomings for users who value aesthetics. ● Other users point out that the deep integration of the Apple mouse with the macOS system can provide a smooth operating experience. ● However, some users believe that this deep integration also limits the compatibility of the Apple mouse on other operating systems. ● Additionally, some users believe that the price of the Apple mouse is too high and does not match its performance and functionality. Conclusion: While some users appreciate its sleek design and integration with the macOS system, many are dissatisfied with the Apple mouse's charging port location, ergonomics, and functionality. Many users believe that the design of the Apple mouse is flawed and not worth buying.

## 关于苹果鼠标设计缺陷的英文讨论总结

根据提供的资料，许多网友对苹果鼠标的设计缺陷，尤其是充电接口位置、人体工程学设计和功能性等方面，展开了激烈的讨论。许多人认为苹果鼠标的设计存在严重缺陷，并不值得购买。

*充电接口位置问题：*

* 许多网友对苹果鼠标将充电接口放置在底部表示强烈不满，认为这种设计极不实用。 * 他们指出，当鼠标需要充电时，用户无法继续使用它，这在工作流程中会造成极大的不便。 * 尽管一些网友认为充电频率不高，且充电速度较快，但其他人则表示电池电量不足的提示不及时，经常导致工作中断。 * 有网友认为苹果公司应该将充电接口移至鼠标前端，以便用户可以边充电边使用。 * 然而，也有网友指出，由于 Magic Mouse 的前端设计非常薄，可能没有足够的空间容纳充电接口。

*人体工程学问题：*

* 许多网友批评苹果鼠标的人体工程学设计糟糕，认为长时间使用会造成手腕疼痛。 * 他们认为，与其他符合人体工程学设计的鼠标相比，苹果鼠标的低矮外形和缺乏侧键使得用户难以舒适地握持和操作。 * 一些网友建议苹果公司提供其他符合人体工程学的鼠标选择，以满足不同用户的需求。

*功能性问题：*

* 一些网友批评苹果鼠标缺乏物理滚轮和右键功能，认为这限制了其功能性和实用性。 * 他们指出，在某些情况下，例如游戏或需要精确操作的应用程序中，物理滚轮和右键是必不可少的。 * 尽管苹果鼠标支持多点触控手势，但一些网友认为这些手势操作并不直观，容易误触，甚至可能导致重复性劳损。

*其他观点：*

* 一些网友认为苹果鼠标的美观设计是其主要卖点，对于注重外观的用户来说，这可能足以弥补其功能上的不足。 * 还有网友指出，苹果鼠标与 macOS 系统的深度整合，可以提供流畅的操作体验。 * 然而，有网友认为这种深度整合也限制了苹果鼠标在其他操作系统上的兼容性。 * 此外，还有一些网友认为苹果鼠标的价格过高，与其性能和功能性不相符。

*总结：*

尽管部分用户欣赏其美观的设计和与 macOS 系统的整合，但许多网友对苹果鼠标的充电接口位置、人体工程学设计和功能性表示不满。许多网友认为苹果鼠标的设计存在缺陷，并不值得购买。

*英文版本：*

## Summary of online discussions on Apple mouse design flaws

Based on the provided information, many online users have engaged in heated discussions about the design flaws of Apple's mouse, particularly in terms of the charging port location, ergonomics, and functionality. Many believe that the design of the Apple mouse is seriously flawed and not worth buying.

*Charging port location issues:*

* Many users expressed strong dissatisfaction with the Apple mouse's charging port being placed at the bottom, considering this design to be extremely impractical. * They point out that users cannot continue to use the mouse when it needs to be charged, which causes significant inconvenience in the workflow. * Although some users believe that the charging frequency is not high and the charging speed is fast, others say that the battery low prompts are not timely, often leading to work interruptions. * Some users believe that Apple should move the charging port to the front of the mouse so that users can use it while charging. * However, some users point out that the front of the Magic Mouse is very thin and may not have enough space to accommodate a charging port.

*Ergonomic issues:*

* Many users criticize the poor ergonomic design of the Apple mouse, arguing that prolonged use can cause wrist pain. * They believe that compared to other ergonomically designed mice, the Apple mouse's low profile and lack of side buttons make it difficult for users to comfortably grip and operate. * Some users suggest that Apple offer other ergonomic mouse options to meet the needs of different users.

*Functionality issues:*

* Some users criticize the Apple mouse for its lack of a physical scroll wheel and right-click function, arguing that this limits its functionality and practicality. * They point out that in some cases, such as gaming or applications that require precise operation, a physical scroll wheel and right-click are essential. * Although the Apple mouse supports multi-touch gestures, some users find these gestures unintuitive, prone to accidental touches, and may even lead to repetitive strain injuries.

*Other opinions:*

* Some users believe that the sleek design of the Apple mouse is its main selling point, which may be enough to compensate for its functional shortcomings for users who value aesthetics. * Other users point out that the deep integration of the Apple mouse with the macOS system can provide a smooth operating experience. * However, some users believe that this deep integration also limits the compatibility of the Apple mouse on other operating systems. * Additionally, some users believe that the price of the Apple mouse is too high and does not match its performance and functionality.

*Conclusion:*

While some users appreciate its sleek design and integration with the macOS system, many are dissatisfied with the Apple mouse's charging port location, ergonomics, and functionality. Many users believe that the design of the Apple mouse is flawed and not worth buying.

However, the problem is that touch is not optimized to perfection For example, I want to have the function of quickly opening an application by swiping up with four fingers on my iPhone. There is no killer optimization solution like bettertouchtool on iPhone

I'm going to try it in Chinese

yes, there are blind people

Oh, you have completed the project I planned. Currently, do you think the difficulty in improving the model lies in voice data, computing power, or algorithm optimization? I personally think that if you want to achieve the ultimate, you don’t need to remove the background sound from the original audio. Outputting audio mixed with background sound as new audio may result in background music,

If you use completely unprocessed speech data (including speech information with background music on YouTube), I think the potential will be higher, but the requirements on your computing power are too high. If you don’t have money to buy a GPU, just use voice noise reduction processing first.

I've been dreaming: can the era of learning foreign languages come to an end now?

Are there large models that fully learn all programming language design principles and all user codes?

Truly achieving natural language programming.

The biggest problem with this statement is that you forget the rental income. In fact, I think the real "house price" should include the annual rent. This part represents your usage fee

Tesla’s approach to pure vision-based autonomous driving—temporarily setting aside lidar and other sensors—seems designed to make this technology more accessible and scalable. By focusing on a vision-only model, they can accelerate adoption and gather large datasets for quicker iterations. Once the vision-based system reaches a mature stage, I imagine Tesla might reintegrate additional sensor data, like lidar or radar, to refine their autonomous driving suite, making it even more robust and closer to perfection.

Additionally, I’ve been exploring an idea about voice interaction systems. Currently, most voice interactions are processed by converting voice input into text, generating a text-based response, and then turning this text back into audio. But what if we could train the system to respond directly in voice, without involving text at all? If developed to maturity, this model could produce responses that feel more natural and spontaneous, possibly diverging from traditional text-to-speech outputs. Natural speech has unique syntax and rhythm, not to mention dialect and tone variations, which could make a purely voice-trained system fascinating and more human-like.

Could you let me know if your current voice interaction model follows the standard speech-to-text-to-speech process, or if there is exploration in voice-to-voice processing?

ArcBrowser functions Chrome Extension Commercial monetization emoji:discussion_white: General Discussion So many functions will definitely affect the speed. Now I am eager to have a Chrome plug-in with arc function. We can freely choose which functions to enable.

I can freely choose whether to enable the boost feature or to open sub-tabs in a pop-up window on Chrome. Isn't that cool?

For TBC, wouldn't it be better to make these functions into separate Chrome extension plugins? I hope they consider this commercial monetization approach.

Upvote 1

Downvote

0 Go to comments

ArcBrowser functions Chrome Extension Commercial monetization emoji:discussion_white: General Discussion So many functions will definitely affect the speed. Now I am eager to have a Chrome plug-in with arc function. We can freely choose which functions to enable.

I can freely choose whether to enable the boost feature or to open sub-tabs in a pop-up window on Chrome. Isn't that cool?

For TBC, wouldn't it be better to make these functions into separate Chrome extension plugins? I hope they consider this commercial monetization approach.

Upvote 1

Downvote

0 Go to comments

It may be faster when switching between multitasking. My problem is mainly that the screen of my m1 mba is too bad. It would be great if I could replace the screen module separately.

It is said that there is no use for network bugs

A month ago I moved all my information and plugins to Firefox, I mainly used plugins for the Android platform, but this company seems to make little profit, its Android browser has a poor UI so far (I need multiple tabs to arrange horizontally on a large screen), I finally switched back to Chrome, and now a troublesome thing is that there is no perfect browser

The interaction of the trackpad with shortcut keys has certain advantages, but I still want to use the mouse (remote buttons, making ppt is more comfortable, etc.), but the MacBook has poor support for wireless mice, and there will be a feeling of fast and slow (it is said that it is useful to achieve a particularly high rate of return), I even found a wired mouse with multiple buttons for my MacBook to use (the scroll wheel can be toggled left and right, and there is also a mouse with side buttons, I only found Logitech's MX580, but unfortunately he does not have a wired version)

I also like the hardware of the Mac and look forward to the M4

Can you read the machine translation flavor of this article, in fact my English is very poor

However, it can take up to 15 hours to deal with possible bugs after the upgrade, and I'm still struggling with whether to upgrade

However, we can't guess whether the judgment is good or not, we need to collect power consumption and loading speed values to prove that the new version is indeed good or not

In this reply box, I just need to press space three times

I am willing to pay for this translation plug-in I use. For example, if I type this word and click the space three times, you can see it in English.