2,806 karma · joined June 11, 2009
I immediately thought of the apartments in Yevgeny Zamyatin's novel We, but maybe it's closer to those in Jacques Tati's movie Playtime. It's spooky when something once intended as dystopian parody now has a real life analog.
ICE sweeps mostly pick up undocumented laborers in the fields and factories. The people have nothing to lose by trying to run away, as they as just going to be deported anyway. So it stands to reason they would be restrained upon arrest. Documented workers on the other hand have a great deal to lose by further aggravating their situation. It is extremely unlikely that a documented worker would try to run away. However, I expect that ICE has to use the same procedures on all demographic groups to avoid charges racial discrimination.
I still use some tools that assume ASCII input. For many years now, Linux tools have been removing the ability to specify default ASCII, leaving UTF-8 as the only relevant choice. This has caused me extra work, because if the data processing chain goes through these tools, I have to manually inspect the data for non-ASCII noise that has been introduced. I mostly use those older tools on Windows now, because most Windows tools still allow you to set default ASCII.
It's personal taste, of course, but Department of Defense sounds mealy-mouthed to me. I actually like the idea of going back to the original name.
I also heard that part of the bad reputation that Bourbaki got was due to their being used in graduate education, despite warnings that they weren't suitable. In the 1950s/60s, there was a lack of good graduate texts. Of course, then Serge Lang came along...
For one thing, native speakers of a language do have something special that non-natives, no matter how educated, do not. That is a general intuition of what sounds right in the language. For a language with as much geographic distribution and variation as English, it is possible to have multiple intuitions in conflict, but it is still at a higher level of sensitivity than non-natives can reach.
This does not mean that native speakers are automatically better teachers. Teaching skill requires training. It is also generally believed among professional educators that non-native speakers are more effective teachers at the lower levels of language competency because they can draw on their own learning experiences when teaching. I believe it is well understood in the teaching profession that native speakers have an edge only when you are concerned with that elusive realm of native-like style.
I find myself very irritated by the argument in TFA, because the author, who I assume has a graduate degree in Linguistics, seems to be oblivious to the difference between Native and Near-Native language competency. The portrayal of employment practices also does not match my experience.
When I started out (and the original Van Halen was still together), blue book exams were the norm in humanities classes. I've had narrow experience with American undergrad classes the past 25 years, so I don't have a feeling for how things have evolved.
Considered this way, the question is whether an LLM could be trained to create joke setups that are ambiguous in the right way, with one obvious interpretation and a hidden but possible interpretation that will be forced by the punchline.
I wasn't referring to that last definition, but to the view that intellectual environment is so important for supporting the exploration of ideas that true solitary creativity doesn't happen. For books arguing this view, try Robert Weisberg, Dean Keith Simonton, and Keith Sawyer. Study specifically on creativity in lab research was done by Kevin Dunbar, who also found the social aspect essential.
Interested in your project. Can you point to any similar books and how you are expanding on them?