1,437 karma · joined February 10, 2020
I do think that its the right thing to do, if the reporter is willing to come to the party, but I also understand why if they dont want to.
> Part of the solution is each distro needs a process for > pushing critical updates (module blacklists, ebpf patches) > to address things like this without forcing all distro > users to reboot, which many won't do promptly anyway.
Almost like a 'mitigation tool' that doesn't require expertise on the users end, but on the providers end.
Why is this assumption incorrect, apple have a long history of breaking away from standards when it doesn't suit them.
I just assume apple will break the behavior when they want to.
The distros dont get any involvement until release, welcome to the suck.
I think you mean, should not.
They want the shortcuts exactly the same, the screens exactly the same, the outputs exactly the same.
They simply dont accept anything else, it basically needs to be a carbon clone copy to keep them happy, and in that case, why bother writing software, you dont win those users, and there is MANY of them.
ITS NOT JUST A PHASE MUM!
29 days for a moon loop. 29 / 4.0 is 7.25. Every 4 weeks you'd be out a full day.
So yes, a week is a human invention.
Bad behavior can't be encouraged.
Opensource has provided training data, closed source code not so much. They will have a bad time learning.