5,099 karma · joined November 5, 2016
[1] https://www.amtrak.com/on-time-performance
[2] https://www.amtrak.com/content/dam/projects/dotcom/english/p...
And here he is explaining why: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32586658
> The short version: job ads are boring. [...]
There’s a quote[1] which makes the rounds occasionally and I think sums up the sentiment pretty well:
> Ok how about this:
> No more billionaires. None.
> After you reach $999 million, every red cent goes to schools and health care.
> You get a trophy that says, “I won capitalism” and we name a dog park after you.
---
> Most billionaires net worth is highly centralised in the stock of the companies they founded[...] unless we are talking asset seizure I am not quite sure how you would do away with [billionaires]
Marginal asset tax rate of 100%? (Really, the main difference between that and the inheritance tax you favor is the timing.) The Wikipedia article[2] has a bunch of arguments for why that might be a bad idea, but it’s reasonably straightforward in principle.
[1] https://twitter.com/Mikel_Jollett/status/1241843944238923777
Also, slinging spurious accusations at someone who’s written some quite interesting comments doesn’t seem like it adds much value to the conversation; and besides, consider the https://xkcd.com/810/ (“constructive spam”) effect.
> By the 2000s, so much information was being generated worldwide that only a small fraction (0.5% in 2015) of the digital data generated was being analyzed at all. [emphasis mine]
Not only is it ‘data analyzed’ and not ‘content consumed,’ but I can’t figure out what they mean by ‘analyzed’ either. Reading the rest of the paragraph makes me think that this is talking about things like clickstream data that businesses love to collect “so we can use big data to enhance user engagement” and then leave to pile up in their data warehouse once they discover that data analysis is hard; if so, this statistic is unrelated to the production:consumption ratio of “content” in the sense of things that people might want to look at on its own merits.
[1]: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/attention_economy_...
(Contents: Introduction, by Harold Wright; Philosophy, by R.B. Braithwaite; Mathematics, by M.H.A. Newman; The craft of experimental physics, by P.M.S. Blackett; Chemistry, by C.P. Snow; Physiological research, by R.K. Matthews; Biology, by C.H. Waddington; History, by R.E. Balfour; The study of the classics at Cambridge, by B.L. Hallward; English literature, by F.L. Lucas)
The type code didn’t carry encoding information, though I believe the later https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Type_Identifier can.
---
An anecdote: I was writing some code to send data to another company as an XML file. When I sent them a test file to validate, I got a complaint that it didn’t declare its encoding as UTF-8.
“Yes, our database uses UCS-2 for exports,” I replied. “Why, can you not read it?”
“Our system imported it just fine,“ they explained, “but it needs to say ‘<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>’ at the top and when I looked at it with a text editor yours says something else there instead.”
“Yes, it doesn’t say UTF-8 because it’s not UTF-8. Sounds like your system is OK with that, though?”
“Yes, the rest of the file is fine, but we can’t move forward with go-live until you conform to the example in our implementation guide...”
Actually changing the encoding proved difficult (for reasons I no longer recall), so I ended up shoving in a string replacement to make the file claim the wrong encoding, along with an apologetic comment; their end apparently did sniffing (and the BOM was unambiguous) so this worked out fine, but it goes to show just how confused people can get about what a character encoding a file actually is.
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Leave laptop unattended in a cold room with a warm cat.
> 2. Cat will sit on laptop keyboard.
> 3. Wait 1 hour.
> 4. Lightdm will become unresponsive.
Also included: “Alternative steps to reproduce if cat is unavailable or uncooperative about being placed on keyboard (see attached pictures)”
(Transcription: a man in a tattered business suit sits across a campfire from some children who are listening to him speak.)
Yes, if you attribute all emissions to the company that originally took the fossil fuels out of the ground (“Scope 3 - use of sold products”), you get a fairly small list, for the simple reason that there aren’t that many energy companies in the world. But all of those “sold products” are being sold to somebody, presumably for a reason. So there are a bunch of ways to tackle the problem, both upstream (only 100 companies need to stop selling fossil fuels to massively reduce emissions!) and downstream (every drop in demand for those companies’ products!)
“notice-dislike bias”: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
“hostile media effect”: https://hn.algolia.com/?query=%22hostile%20media%20effect%22...
(At least, I think that the argument you’re making is about modern logistics and modern rail freight being surprisingly incompatible. But it’s hard to tell since you haven’t actually provided a rebuttal.)
McIlroy also touches on this in his review, though from the other direction:
> Perhaps the greatest strength of WEB is that it allows almost any sensible order of presentation. Even if you did not intend to include any documentation, and even if you had an ordinary cross-referencer at your disposal, it would make sense to program in WEB simply to circumvent the unnatural order forced by the syntax of Pascal.
[1] Of “Knuth v McIlroy” fame: https://homepages.cwi.nl/~storm/teaching/reader/BentleyEtAl8...
- Be aware that NB is perhaps best described as a “501(c)(3) disorganization.” The entire thing is volunteer-run, more or less by whoever happens to be there that day, so it’s pretty chaotic and your experience as a newcomer can vary wildly depending on when you happen to visit.
- You can just show up! Ring the doorbell and hope someone answers (6-8PM is a good bet, though there can be people there at all hours). Once you get a tour, hang out and chat with people. As others have noted it can be a mixed bag who you run into on any given day. The space is open to the public, with all that entails.
- You might also try some of the regularly scheduled events (some combination of https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Events and https://www.meetup.com/noisebridge/events/ should get you a sort-of-mostly-up-to-date view of things); that way you’ll have an organizer and a topic to start with.
- There are also a lot of other hackerspaces/makerspaces in the area! Many of them are more formal than Noisebridge, with all the differences that come with that.
What are the commented bits like /* __REMOVE_LINE__ / and / __SCHEMA_IMPORT__ */ used for?
If you introduce a bit of randomness into the retry timing (say, multiply by 1.8~2.2 instead of a straight doubling), that thundering herd will spread itself out and be much easier to recover from.