386 karma · joined July 22, 2019
I can't believe they only have 295,000 paying customer, that puts me in a small minority. lol
Not all of it would be debt. Google, Meta, Microsoft and AWS have massive profit to fund their build outs. Power infrastructure will be funded by govts and tax dollars.
right... none of them are saying that. They could probably use more GPUs considering the price of GPUs and memory are skyrocketing and the supply chain can't keep up. It's about experimentation, they need real users and real feedback to know how to improve the current generation of models, and figure out how to monetise them.
It's also important to note that other control systems in the body that affect control systems in the mind, eg. endocrine.
Wow!! That seems so simple, and literally a few weeks to do in today's ecosystem, now thoroughly testing make take a little more time, but wow, I wonder if it was evening attempting to do RAG.
but yea, I agree, which to do. My random take would be do the opposite of what you normally do... my scientific expertise on this, I've started ~100 projects in the last year, and mostly "finished" 3...
Giving up on that is stupid, and would set society back. We need more companies and organisations doing it. AI has brought a few new startups into the search space, but yes, splitting the companies up may make more opportunities for them.
That said, if you can raise the capital you can get into search, because of opportunities presented by AI, and google has been sacrificing quality for optimising ad revenue. Email has also seen some startups making big leaps by adopting AI. I wouldn't touch video sharing platforms, or ad networks.
I'm guessing most of the training data was single-turn, instead of multi-turn, but that should be relatively easy to iterate on.
And with fine tuning, there's zero math needed, it's a bit of common sense, and a lot's of data optimization.