whoaisme

Dan G would make the perfect Nazi. Makes excuses for censorship, defends censorship by claiming it is his job, acts like something he goes out of his way to do is something he finds necessary but distasteful. Disgusting.

It's irritating to see this trite message whenever anyone says anything slightly controversial. No one elected you head censor.

Yeah I also like that about china. For example this time it didn't interfere https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/genghis-khan-exhibition... Could site countless of other examples of the chinese not meddling

That seems like a poor counter. Everyone gets sick as far as I know not everyone becomes disabled.

Maybe it would? I mean if yyou're smart tell us how 50 percent of Canucks getting wiped out would play out. You act as if plenty of political entities didn't cease to exist because of the plague.

Yeah it's not as if Texas was frozen over helpless and without power not too long ago

Yeah I guess decent people are dummies for not wanting to live in the world made in the wake of geniuses like you and Harvey Weinstein.

In your mind what does the word often mean?

Just because competition and the "market" don't think much of your preference doesn't mean it doesn't exist lol. What a self centered view! Also it seems to me when there are no variations in the options that's when it gets the most competitive. Commodity markets are the most competitive in the world. Jesus.

Which is crazy. Wealthy people can afford to view housing as an asset because they are wealthy. Poor people can't afford property because they are poor. That's like saying feudal lords were wise for viewing grain as an asset and not an expense. Wild.

Ken M is that you?

There are no benefits to you. There are plenty of benefits to me. Let the market decide? Probably not. It's easy to accuse people of logical fallacies while somehow you're the sole arbitrator to what is and isn't good for users.

I always thought it was strange the way the Black Hills are said to be a sacred part of Lakota culture but they only held that area for not even 100 years between genociding off the origibal Cheyenne in the area and getting genocided by white settlers. Like how come their feelings about land they killed for mean more than other people who killed for the same land. It's strange how we treat Natives in this racist way where we ignore the fact that they were racist murdering people just like the Europeans.

"It's more important to keep in mind that the CCP created hundreds of thousands of new jobs, raised minimum wage in many areas, and brought many people out of absolute poverty. No matter which way you look at it, a net positive rather than a negative."

Your logic seems highly suspect.