6,682 karma · joined December 5, 2014
it is insane and unnatural but it is also common
fundamentally capitalist concept
contact napping to beyond 1yo is deeply natural and special
100%. it pisses me off so much that i have to hear this idea thrown around constantly.
it's almost August - companies should have two years of progress since Jan 1 2026.
Amdahl's Law should be familiar to anyone with a 4y computer science/engineering degree. Why aren't they applying it to their own throughput?
it's coming out of the salary budget from what i've seen. i've seen a company both say "AI max. it's the future! don't be late" and then go on to increase limits to compensation across the board.
the pro-AI side on the other hand has poured billions into ads and marketing and CEOs are forcing it on people due to a combo of FOMO, personal investments in AI (CEO, board, investor), etc
i have yet to have an LLM beat me. i am forced to try regularly so i don't look like an AI anti at a company that is very much SV pilled
get ahead at work? split into commits and make it look like multiple days of work
work on your own IP during work hours? edit the timestamp to be outside work hours (i even have a script for this)
so even if you 10x your coding, you aren't gonna have an appreciable effect on total output
Is this true? When I was in high school, teachers could take away your phones.
not to mention the trillions yet to be spent.
it kinda all works but it's an earth-scale blood from a stone. the resources needed to even do these parlor tricks is nutso.
> If projects like Bun can be substantially rewritten and shipped to millions of users, it suggests we're entering a very different phase of software development.
exactly. this wasn't a technical project. this was a marketing stunt that worked on you.
okay let's change that? seems bad
that would be existential doom for them because then they have a case to claim ownership of their users' codebases
no corporation would sign off on that
> CharmingBlaze and cursoragent committed
oh..
2. This is full of "co-authored with cursoragent" so this is ..not (1) lol so who cares