what

This smells wrong to me. You already have people working at the water treatment plant. You don’t need it connected to the internet?

You don’t need to run your app in the background. You can register your app as some extension to handle photo backups/cloud storage and you just setup a request to upload to a particular url when a new photo is added, iOS will background those requests and retry them and what not.

>At the very least, you (historically) expect them to sell the practice to someone they think is a worthy successor.

PE isn’t that.

Except they always strip mine the business. Cut the quality and push unnecessary shit. But, hey, you can fill out your forms on an iPad instead of pen and paper. Very cool.

Why do you need to sell a private practice? There’s no brand to sell, it’s just you and that will be gone.

PE is scourge in this space. They’ve probably taken over every dental office already and now they push unnecessary procedures and whatever your insurance will bear just because.

Kind of silly. You have to pay somehow. Either pony up cash or pay with your eyeballs or data. But I doubt paying will give you privacy either.

>Not to mention Facebook is free whereas you pay for a GPT subscription

The overwhelming majority of users do not pay and use the free service.

Then it’s not air gapped…

>all by itself

Or it’s read countless articles on doing the same thing.

Are you really charging $9/onion? I get upset when Safeway charges $2/lb when I can get onions for a quarter that price.

You seem salty. The entire post a ton of words that says basically nothing at all.

I honestly don’t think you’d get that much variation. Beyond phone/sms, the list would likely end up with just these:

- decent camera

- messaging apps (WhatsApp/telegram/signal/etc)

- email

- maps

- rideshare (uber/lyft)

- mobile wallet (tap to pay)

People will also demand a browser, but that kind of defeats the purpose. All the apps should be utilities that you can’t spend hours in.

I suspect people would also demand music streaming, but I’m not sure really why you need that.

The size of this thing really puts me off. It’s like two iPhone minis stacked on top of each other, which seems massive for a flip phone.

>note to normies this is like saying "have a quantum multiplexer"

I don’t think you helped the normies out.

I’m confused why they would contact the person that gave you the relic to tell them it was a false positive? It doesn’t seem like something they would do. Why not contact you?

They worked other jobs, no? No one paid them specifically to invent calculus or anything of the sort.

Where did you get the impression the author thinks it’s a bad thing? From the article:

> These are public keys, which are meant to be published - recovering one lets anyone check a signature, not forge one.

> taking half of someone’s money is totally fine

Okay. Then let’s also reduce what’s spent welfare/benefits by a similar amount, at least we’re not taking money they worked for.

> hurting mortgage holders

How does raising rates hurt mortgage holders? They locked in their interest rate when they got the mortgage?

> considering LLMs currently play better than a brand new human player would

They’ve ingested all the literature on playing chess, a brand new human player has not.

Because then it’s not playing chess, stockfish is?

I can write a chess bot program that will beat you. Does that mean I’m good at chess?

>If they cared to have it perform well in chess games, you'd see a different shape and behavior.

So the things they claim are on the verge of AGI actually aren’t? They need to be trained for specific tasks?

Humans don’t code a $game engine to play $game, they can just play it. It seems like you are the one that has gone insane.

> Claude Fable would destroy any human at chess by coding a strong enough engine on the fly.

Delusional, but then Claude fable also isn’t beating any human at chess, the engine is.

You realize that vaccine hesitancy isn’t new and wasn’t a right wing thing? The right wing only has a disbelief about the covid vaccine and probably rightfully so. It went from: you can’t get it if youre vaccinated; okay you can get it but you can’t spread it; okay okay you can get it and spread but maybe the severity is reduced.

Can you share with the class the web apps you’ve built this way?

Stop with this nonsense. They could write in their own language and translate it, which wouldn’t end up being clanklish.

Why should they? Why can’t they just make shoes and be happy about it?

OpenAI is 501c3, should they also be required to release everything?

> So you can, in fact, get better performance sometimes by applying some variant of "assume this problem is solvable" or "other problems like this were already solved by AIs" pep talk. Not always, far from it, but it does happen on the occasion with frontier capabilities.

Are you superstitious?