webknjaz

This viewpoint couldn't be more ruscist. Why do you push the terrorist mass murderer propaganda so hard?

It's that opening statement that invokes memories of how the ruscist regime justifies the mass murder. It's the first thing the reader sees and it sets the tone/perception. I was confused as well, had to reread the thing.

Before, as in 2012, right?

Urgh.. It's so unsettling how easy people fall for the "innocent act" of the person who routinely supports genocide. And it's a known systemic consistent behavior in the public statements — he's been supporting the mass murderers for many years. In his late post he suggests that the murdered Ukrainians are somehow the same as the ruscist rapists who killed them. In the past he was shifting the blame for the rssian fascist ethnical cleansing to Ukraine as well: https://twitter.com/TheLarkInn/status/1625276917363646465. He'd probably also blame black people for being enslaved, and rape victims too. This does correlate with the color of his passport but it's just that — a correlation. His actions* speak louder than words. Encouraging people to send him money equals indirectly funding the genocidal maniacs. Don't fund the terrorists, it's as simple as that.

It's a misconception that people hate him for being rssian. It's more like people dislike finding a consistent genocide apologist who has been publicly supporting the mass murderers for many years. This is a systemic position of his. In his late post he suggests that the murdered Ukrainians are somehow the same as the ruscist rapists who killed them. In the past he was shifting the blame for the rssian fascist ethnical cleansing to Ukraine as well: https://twitter.com/TheLarkInn/status/1625276917363646465. This does correlate with the color of his passport but it's just that — a correlation. His actions speak louder than words. Encouraging people to send him money equals indirectly funding the genocidal maniacs. Don't fund the terrorists, it's as simple as that.

Героям Слава!

It also has a lot of downsides which is why I avoid it, for example. The purpose of the article is not to point at other tools but to show how to use setuptools better.

Note that with the recent versions of `build` it's recommended not to pass `--sdist --wheel`. Just do:

    python -m build

With this invocation it'll produce an sdist, and then it'll build a wheel from that tarball, not from your Git checkout which is much closer to what pip does in the wild. When building both artifacts from a Git checkout, it's possible to mess up packaging making it impossible to produce a wheel out of an sdist (which is necessary in many places, including installs from tarballs that pip tries to build wheels from and downstream packaging in different OS ecosystems).

Save this tutorial to your bookmarks, then: https://packaging.python.org/tutorials/packaging-projects/#c...

Is that about the community supported stuff that got moved out because nobody maintained it?

With Ansible Collections, it'll be easier because it's a proper packaging format. The tarball are uploaded to Galaxy, it's not just pointing to GitHub.

OTOH talking about Git: I usually recommend using subtrees in place of submodules as they allow you to actually merge-in the contents of other trees rather than holding pointers to them.