(maybe I was a little bit off, it's more likely that the risk of failure is 1/1000, so sum is 1/1.000.000)
but the point is, it's more risky to drive back home after the weekend than to recreational cave dive, especially with dive fatigue!
225 karma · joined November 25, 2011
Now I'm post-doc/engineer at University Joseph Fourier, still in the same team, continuing my PhD work as part of the Nano2017 national research project (although debugging and embedded system has (nothing) to do with nano technologies!).
http://blog.0x972.info/?d=2014/09/18/08/55/00-about-me
(maybe I was a little bit off, it's more likely that the risk of failure is 1/1000, so sum is 1/1.000.000)
but the point is, it's more risky to drive back home after the weekend than to recreational cave dive, especially with dive fatigue!
It's a sport that requires a lot of preparation, planning, risk estimation and counter-measures. My hobby cave dives are nothing like such explorations, but the principles are the same.
In the end, when you go diving, the level of risk is close to 0: one regulator may fail (risk around 1/100 if well checked), two won't fail during the same dive (risk of two failures 1/100 x 1/100 = 1/10000 which is negligible--if I got the figure right, I didn't double check! EDIT: it's rather 1/1000 x 1/1000 = 1/1.000.000). And we use two independent air tanks, and with air reserves managed with one regulator fault in mind, as well as the 'little' panic induce by the regulator fault. That's called the 1/4 rule, we use it in France in FFESSM diving organisation.
... and now I learn that I can hack the firmware! so for an "affordable programmable drone suitable for children", I think that's the best answer (it's just $14 on banggood). Buy spare batteries though, and maybe with budget < $100, buy two of them :)
And how about the context switch cost? being used to Linux, I'd think that the execution flow has to jump back and forth between kernel and user space to call the translators, and again and again if you chain them?
1: http://oceans.taraexpeditions.org/m/qui-est-tara/les-expedit...
Basically, if I understand well, it's a GUI over `git add -p`. Instead of the CLI short diff, you get a `meld` instance that computes the diff between two (virtual) directories, one with the modified files of your git, one with the current index. And like `git -p`, you select what you want to add to the index.
That seems great to have a global vision of modifications, and to be able to navigate between the differents files to remember exactly what belongs to the commit!
I had such a tool in mind since I discovered `git add -p`, thanks for working on it!
You first have to localize a region (function) you want to study, then you reach one of its execution with a breakpoint, or a conditional breakpoint.
Then, you inspect:
- the callstack: in which condition the function was call
- the parameters / local variables
- the subfunctions: in both tools, you can manually call any (reachable) function, try different parameter values and check the result. Pay attention through to the side effects!
if is_gain: calc_formula_is_gain(a, b)
else: calc_formula(a, b)
However a completly agree it makes sense with sin/cos functions.- thanks for doing your job correctly, in a manner I appreciate/have nothing to complain against
- thanks because you're not a machine, whereas many people may disdain you and act like they're facing a machine
- thanks because I don't want do give you orders, it's your job to serve me, but nonetheless I don't command you
> So, I switched to Arch after almost 3 blue years. And the only why left for me is because others do it better!
start + index * offset
points to `start` when `offset` is 0 (ie, array indexing in C and other languages with 'direct' memory access).Any other reason?
Maybe you can edit the title and add a little [199] :-)
> gcc test.c -g > test.c:9:5: error: redefinition of ‘foo’ > int foo () > gcc version 4.9.2 (GCC) (archlinux)
regarding your feedback, I don't see any shadow in FF! The CSS is not mine, and there's indeed a `text-shadow` set for the text so I've removed it. Let me know if it's still bad, and maybe which browser you're using
It's also interesting to look how the algorithm tries to improve the location of the different names, it seems to something like "I need to be a N pixel from center, and ni for group i, move to adjust and try again"
They generate the map of the "visible" panorama from this website [2], but I can't find how they built the KML file that can be seen at the bottom of [1], any idea ? or maybe it's an in-house tool, I can't read Polish !
1: http://www.dalekieobserwacje.eu/alpy-kotyjskie-oraz-nadmorsk...
2: http://www.udeuschle.selfhost.pro/panoramas/makepanoramas_en...
1. Item one
1. Item two
1. Subitem a
1. Subitem b
does work, so that let me think that you just need to improve the parser to consider "a b c" as a valid ordered list, and maybe "i ii iii" at the same time?(I replaced a, b and 2 by 1 to force the automatic numbering)