Well seeing as the Republican platform is "any election that we don't win is ipso facto fraudulent", I suppose that they had to make this change in order to avoid losing out on those sweet Republican ad dollars.
4,000 karma · joined July 3, 2016
> Musk seemed to confirm that Irwin's departure was caused by the What Is a Woman? incident. When asked if the events were related, Musk replied, "director related"—seemingly a typo for "directly related."
My view is that the only way to legally mitigate it is to target the generalization of the problem: social media. Niche forums/chats are probably acceptable, but anything with massive reach should just be categorically banned.
Twitter’s failure didn’t cost them an 80% drop in users listening to the stream or anything like that. Why aren’t these evil journalists focusing on the REAL NEWS, the generic campaign announcements contained within the restarted, much smaller stream?
Walkable communities and sensible urban planning? If you have a long drive to the office, the problem is the poor zoning policies that allowed that to happen.
I find it utterly baffling that the US is in a position to easily absorb the best and brightest from other countries, and yet shoots itself in the foot with ridiculously restrictive immigration policies.
Honestly, sounds like the system is working as intended. Spitting in the halway and stealing laundry carts sound minor, but they contribute to making life miserable for the other tenants.
At one point I saw a proposal to put cartoon eyes on self driving cars that could turn and “look” at you to achieve this effect.
Actually seems like a good idea to me!
There should have been a migration path from legacy to new verified, but instead they just unverified everyone (including obviously government accounts that under the new rule should retain a grey check).
Having everyone lock themselves inside and exclusively interact via video chat is not a good thing, IMO.