Twitter safety chief resigns after Musk criticizes decision to restrict film

I'm curious what job qualifications are needed to be a "Twitter Safety Chief". It sounds like a professional hall monitor. In this specific instance, how is someone's actual safety impacted after watching a film where someone said something they found offensive? There is no human right to not be offended.

Watching this from afar, we have highly paid executives throwing public tantrums like petulant children. It's farcical.

Why would the film be restricted at all? I’m confused.

Because ideologues fear the power of the Socratic method to expose irrationality

"after" in the title is a weasel word meant to imply causality when there nothing to substantiate it.

Did you read the article?

> Musk seemed to confirm that Irwin's departure was caused by the What Is a Woman? incident. When asked if the events were related, Musk replied, "director related"—seemingly a typo for "directly related."

Might want to read up on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction

MUSK INTERNET DEFENSE FORCE: ACTIVATE!