3,705 karma · joined March 30, 2009
jon(nospace)prins(at)gmail(dot)com
But due to collusion, sometime-insufficient regulation (e.g., ad networks that can and do deliver malware), sometime-overbearing regulation (e.g., software patents), and ... well ... the rest of the real world, Adam Smith market economics is exceedingly reductionist. It works in the microcosm. Until you take into account that no economic entity or system is fully enclosed.
For example: has Blackboard yet been toppled, or are they still suing and/or acquiring any potential competitor via its vast patent portfolio, all the while being the absolute worst solution to its problem possible?
That's why hospitalization is often necessary when beginning treatment for depression when that depression includes suicidal ideation, but is not necessary for the duration of treatment.
You don't understand racism at all. That's not even the dictionary definition of it. Any of the dictionary definitions of it.
Racism is believing that one race is superior and basing the oppression of other races upon that belief.
Thus, the oppressed cannot be racist. They can be intolerant or bigoted or any of many other things; but they cannot be racist because they are not coming from a position of privilege to even be able to oppress.
Once they go on antidepressants, they go on suicide watch. It's the most dangerous time. Because they'll still be depressed, but they'll finally have the energy to get up. And they just might have the energy to do themselves in.
If there was a light rail to an urban center and I could get my daily/weekly errands done via walking or cycling, sure.
But the car centric culture of, well, just about everywhere is IMHO grosser than an "urban prison"
There was always the urban legend that if you said just the right thing to a wisp, good things would happen...
So ahead of its time, that game. And so unable to evolve to become relevant after most of its groundbreaking ideas were dropped because, for 1998, they were unattainable.
In some respects, it was a victim of its own success...
(before you could target the repair skill to items in the trade menu)
That's the only time I'm targeting them... To fix what they screw up.
It actually has been "field tested" - and in the US of A, no less.
The entire state of Alaska has a guaranteed minimum income.
Granted, it isn't much - on average it's been about $1,000 per anum.
There is nothing special treatment about having the ability to identify yourself as yourself.
And discrimination is very real, from being fired for being trans/genderqueer to being murdered for being trans/genderqueer.
Heightening visibility by, e.g., providing an option on a salary survey, helps fight against the very real violence that the LGBTQ community still experiences.
It's important because not representing it as a viable selection reinforces discrimination[0] against those who don't identify as one of the binary genders.
In any case, your reduction of things to 0.0000001% of the entire population is pretty heinously insensitive (then again, this is Hacker News, so cis-sexism and transphobia is generally expected). And pretty false. In a UK survey, 0.4% (or 1 in 250 people) identified as neither fully male nor fully female [1].
Edit: by adding more than the binary male/female, especially with a salary thing like this, you can more easily expose discrimination in pay between not only those who identify as male or identify as female but also those who identify as trans/queer. And given that there is a lot of discrimination out there against us (it's not even illegal to discriminate against trans/genderqueer in many, many, many states), it's an important data point to collect.
0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination_towards_non-bin...
1. http://practicalandrogyny.com/2014/12/16/how-many-people-in-...
Consider adding a non-binary/genderqueer option, please.
And the best parts are already here in es2015.
When I first started in my adult adventure in math (never doing well with it academically, I started on pre-calc with Khan Academy about a year and a half ago; I'm now working through multivariable calculus on MIT OCW), I used scratch mode in emacs because hey, I'm right there on the computer.
I gave up and started using graph paper as my scratch pretty quickly :)
I can't imagine trying to actually _do_ math with something "descriptive" like LaTeX.
Math, from what I've come to realize, is less about describing how to compute something and more about describing something in such a way that it can be manipulated in order to reveal something new.
And that's why the obtuse iconography is popular in math, and why the obtuse iconography of APL never became truly mainstream in programming.
So yeah, between illegally trying to evict me, never once exterminating that place, etc etc .... I'm glad I don't live in a building owned by a shitty landlord anymore. I'd give my previous landlord a solid F-; I'd give my current landlord an A. I'm also paying 150% what my previous place was for the privilege of having a landlord that doesn't violate the law monthly.