wannabe44

If you have ever been a farmer or in a related profession, you would know animal populations need to be kept in control.

For one thing, Indians aren't giving hormone inhibitors to their children, Illegal immigration is almost universally viewed as bad, and every 10th girl is not an onlyfans starlet. Indians have better chances of being alright, although they lack a strong leader and will likely remain below China.

Well the monkeys should be just shot in that case. Violence is an underrated solution.

That's just meme spread by left-leaning media in the west, (and their cronies in certain Indian mainstream media outlets) who can't tolerate anyone developing a national identity.

"I got tired of blabla so I built blabla" don't y'all get tired of this?

Everyone ^H^H^H^H everyone's clanker is building the same things.

Didn't know there was rust worker support. I stand corrected.

1. There's always a possibility they evaluated Rust / Go, concluded the agentic code in those languages is less maintainable / productive (for AI agents) than typescript, but didn't spell it out to avoid internet flame wars. For instance, recent Microsoft rewrite of copilot almost doubled the code size.

2. They may intend the parts of it to be reused on workers?

File by file porting can be done almost always with local reasoning. I don't think it proves much for novel projects which still seems to crumble under complexity past a small sloc limit.

The incidents were caused because they deliberately wanted the publicity or dont know shit about sandboxing.

In any reasonably written Go code, you wouldn't be doing multi-word slice / interface assignments often. Also most places happen to run go test -race.

To get rid of this issue, go must add a level of indirection or track aliasing at compile time; the tradeoff Go made here is perfectly reasonable.

It's a bad design regardless, borrowing from JSX playbook.

GP is pointing out this introduces this kind of special DSL syntax with HTML tags into a procedural/functional language like rust?

Even though macros can do this, it's not intuitive to expect this kind of JSX soup in rust. It's difficult to reason about than a function call. Something like flutter where widgets are ordinary function calls is far better.

Plus the macros add to the compile time tax.

This is another exhibit that rust is full of web programmers from React JS world (the above is exactly like JSX), all about aesthetics than practicality and predictability these days, pulling what should be a system language into incompatible directions.

Long live zig for trying engineering directions rust couldn't. But we need a rust killer with memory safety which gatekeeps web programmers and slop peddlers.

That post called for deportation and not killing of illegal immigrants. If you people ever interact outside your bubble, those are normal opinions held by normal people (even though I would not consider DHH normal) and you people are snowflakes.

In any case railers are screwed (or railed, if I may). Either use the upstream which DHH is going to slopify and slowly kill, or use these forks by left-fascists who might happily sabotage you for perceived wrongthink in future.

... that don't work

Thanks claude :-)

Suggestion: rename it to "Unreliable Agent"

> no one is getting rich selling anti-loneliness pills (yet)

Social media, dating apps, even andrew tate was doing well till some point.

What do you do for memory management? Conservative GC or Ref counting? If ref counting, how do you detect cycles?

It does appear most JS features can be translated to C++, even if at some overhead. Did you encounter any which wasn't straightforward?

I (not GP) have no issues with CSS part of the design (just as I am fine with bootstrap websites). But if you can't be arsed to write 4 lines of text describing it in human language instead of the claude vomit, you probably didn't put much effort to begin with.

x < 1

AI doesn't fix bad ideas. As computer industry has become the cash cow for erstwhile bankers and stockmarket brokers, expect decline of general software and rise of a small niche (zig is a recent example but also suckless / plan 9 crowd, gentoo linux, some parts of FP / PLT crowd) which try to preserve their own little world despite economic incentives to do otherwise.

We will imprison these slop addicted monke brains and start new academic regime, only hand written OCaml code allowed.

Jokes aside, have you watched 2001 - a space Odyssey?

> Sure, there is still use for language expertise, but not enough to get excited over new concepts and ideas.

In 5-10 years, the people who have paid attention to these will be needed to bail us out of the mess that the rest of the slop-addled monke brains have created.

I feel most LSPs I used are fairly good at both. Sometimes I get no completion suggestions, look at the sidebar and fix compile errors, then start getting suggestions. For whatever reason, it's a fine trade off for parsing errors.

It's only a problem because it clouds the blockbuster IPO.

Google docs fixes all grammatical mistakes.

Only real difference is that `fold` is denser. Both require prior knowledge to understand in their respective paradigms.

Adding numbers like this is not common in real world code. Now let's say instead of adding x, you have too look up X in a cache with an additional "type" param and update a metric of cache hits (or misses). You have to define a free function to keep your fold readable and understandable. In for loop it's much easier to understand.

You're underestimating web developers.

This. I don't want your browser engine to use all my cores. I want the rest of my cores to be compiling C++.

What is /r/pcj? In any case, memes start due to real world examples.