3,468 karma · joined July 10, 2016
meet.hn/city/53.550341,10.000654/Hamburg
Recently:
I've managed to "stablize" a Maven-based latex build by throwing it away and just using Github actions to generate the PDF. Hallelujah, it worked!
I've had to compile my CV on multiple machines for various reasons of expediency, and I've tried to use VSCode, but it takes an age to setup and I can't figure it out, so back to TexPad (now -> Texifier) I go, and fiddle with the settings until it compiles.
Somebody point me to a system that works across Macs and non-Macs please.
If Typst can somehow build that ecosystem of packages (personally, I use it for letters, reports, my CV, and a songbook for the ukulele with tab diagrams) then it'll truly be a killer.
This car is basically a kid’s drawing meeting origami
However, I think the digital signing is a good way to provide the photographer with proof that the picture in the paper/competition is the picture that they made with the camera and not their pal Midjourney.
Why they put it in such a sluggish contraption, I don’t know, but probably a good place to start compared to a Z9 and trying to tag pictures at 500 frames a second or whatever.
Sauce: https://www.occrp.org/en/dominica-passports-of-the-caribbean...
Minerals: 0.00025 Tons
goes off to have a nice cup of tea and waits for all this to blow over
I also hear you on the point about transitioning to newer tools, but would suggest that photography has always required significant personal investment in money and time, and one must sweat the assets as they say, to make them pay off. Some technologies seem more convenient, like digital, but can end up by funnelling all the effort onto fewer people, instead of throwing the film over the fence to other professionals who could do a much better and faster job of developing and printing.
Sometimes of course, the sweat and toil is all part of the product - as no doubt my mate who built his own camera made from the timber of the woods near his home would tell you - but in the modern world, most people just want to see the image as soon as they can…
Truecrypt was really great, and I enjoyed their take on plausible deniability, but haven’t used it since maybe 2006.
You can be as rich as Croesus and still as clueless as <insert economic pundit>
Perjorative labels aren't what they used to be, people are happy to be labelled most of the time, so yes, maybe it'll be cool to be a, erm, "wokerat"?
(Reference for non-UK viewers: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2022/oct/18/suell...)
Daguerreotypes are pretty artifacts in comparison. Fox Talbot was the Gutenberg of photography.
This works better than I can possibly tell you.
I have an Epson WorkForce ES-580W that I bought when my mother passed away to bulk scan documents and it scans everything, double-sided if required, multi-page PDFs if required, at very high speed and uploads everything to OneDrive, at which point I drag and drop everything into Paperless.
I could, thinking about it, have the scanner email stuff to Paperless. Might investigate that today.
Paperless will OCR it and make it all searchable. This setup is amazing, I love living in the future.
As for One Instant film, sheesh, a labour of love. Mine are stashed away along with the last of my peel-apart, I should just use them all.
At this confluence of money-time-effort, I hope we would recognize a black hole when we encounter it on earth and find a better way, but it apparently requires EVEN MORE money to fix, thanks to the destruction.
https://www.zluxtech.com/store/products/polaroid-600se-insta...
Ultra-niche use, of course, but there you go, there's nothing as zero-config as this thing.
This is a printed-to-order back for the 600SE that I was considering:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/134203663096?amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA0...