vitobotta

Isn't Yahoo powered by Bing?

LOL Can you believe that I searched this discussion I started just to see if somebody would change mind since then? :D

Cool, it's also a nice way to discover repos and projects

Wonderful, thank you for your comments. I can definitely see what you mean about the cost of your own time, and all makes more sense now if Heroku is as reliable et all as you suggest.

@jrsmith1279, Have you tried to schedule tasks directly from within your app with Rufus Scheduler, instead of Cron?

-2 for what? :D

LOL, would be interesting to see the reaction of an employer

As I suggest in the article, you can outsource your comments to Disqus, Intense Debate, Facebook or other service.

So you won't need any server side technology and you'll give your users a much better commenting experience.

Hi all, thank you very much for your so nice feedbacks! I am really glad since it took quite some time to write, so it's nice to hear people find it useful.

@albedoa, I haven't paginated category pages yet since I don't have that many posts yet, but I think it is possible to do with a plugin that would generate those pages from a custom hash / data set, rather than what Jekyll makes available. I don't know if what I mean is clear but I will look into making an example.

@aw3c2, any web host will be good for Jekyll, since it's just static files that any web server can handle. As long as you are happy with the different workflow, you can switch without any problems. Actually, since your host has PHP you could use it for the contact form, as mentioned in the post.

Thanks apu, that makes sense. I am kind of new around here, so I hadn't noticed that yet.

I hope you read the post anyway despite the looks of my blog :D and if you are available for hire to redesign it and make it prettier, and won't cost me a fortune, let me know! :)

At the very beginning of the post, before anything else, I said that I am not a designer but a developer. I even admitted that "I may sometimes struggle to choose two colors that fit well together" ! :)

I actually explained that I have written the post on usability, SEO, performance and security aspects of techniques for web typography currently available; I do believe that many "designers", instead, often just care about the looks of what they do, while completely ignoring the issues mentioned in the post. Either because they don't care, or more likely because many, if not most, "designers" just lack for what I can see the kind of basic technical knowledge on usability/accessibility, SEO, performance, and security required to even understand those issues. I don't think that being able to make a stunning layout out of a PSD makes anybody, say, a "complete" designer.

As for the purely aesthetic aspects of the techniques I've mentioned, or of anything related to web design in general, I haven't even touched them, because I wouldn't have much to say.

So I am sad that the very basic layout of my blog has perhaps distracted you -and possibly others- from the contents of that post. I should perhaps get a designer to make a proper custom template for me so to avoid this in the future, since I plan on writing more on "non-aesthetic" aspects of web design :)

Uhm, weird, I meant to reply to you but for some reason the reply link which I could see and use now didn't show up before (?)

Thanks to both for the clarification. I will take a chance to test this more in detail with a couple of virtual machines (since I use Mac) perhaps tomorrow or as soon as I have some time; does the library I liked here and in the post solve the issue? I admit I tested it quickly (say 5 minutes or less) with Windows VMs, but at that time everything looked OK to me using that library, since the custom web fonts were disabled (and replaced with the closest similar web-safe fonts) on for example Windows XP with Clear Type switched off so avoid the bad rendering in those conditions.

Believe me, I don't like pagination either - and I really mean it, but I thought that a single page or fewer pages would be too long to read, and I also thought it would be easier to organise the information in distinct sections.

Next time I will reduce the number of pages though, if feedbacks like yours suggest that I do so :)

As for the font rendering issues, I did mention -although briefly- the https://github.com/MichaelvanLaar/Webfont-Load-Enhancer library, as a possible solution to improve the web font experience on Windows. Did you mean this or something else?

Thanks a lot for your feedback ;)