15 karma · joined June 11, 2013
https://www.fastscience.tv/summary/teslas-energy-efficient-s...
So you can technically sell a fake of physical, but you have to give up the ownership of the shoe (virtual). And therefore, can't sell a fake twice.
It's a shoe version of Cryptokitties.
Regarding point 2: I have never heard anyone tokenizing physical assets using conventional databases. Reason is multiple people may hold part of the value/asset, no one wants to trust anyone else.
Associating one QR code with one shoe is simply not the same thing. Nike doesn't have to make the whole ledger public through give the nature of blockchain, it can be assured that it has not been altered.
IMO they are tracking ownership of each pair with the help of these tokens and once the real shoe is sold the token is transferred to someone else's digital wallet.
Putting a QR code on shoe is not really effective as it can copied/pasted on a different shoe etc.
The patent is owned by Locus Robotics and granted recently.
How do the references to smartdust (milli-sized robots?) and military come in?