News to me. The EU most definitely has NN and healthy competition, it's doing fine.
670 karma · joined January 25, 2015
News to me. The EU most definitely has NN and healthy competition, it's doing fine.
When you have tweets like this [0] from politicians it gives the impression that people do actually think like that.
[0] https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/705171336381923328
But I don't see this as an attack on Net Neutrality, you're just charged differently for what you use. Nobody will stop you using Facebook when you have a Music subscription, nothing is throttled.
That part. It was a long time ago.
Indeed, just from my experience.
This just isn't true. Take Norvatis for example, one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world. The US makes 35% of their revenue and Europe another 35%, with the rest of the world sharing the rest. [0]
I wouldn't call that "most of their revenue". In fact, I don't see anything out of the ordinary about revenue gained per customer, given the size and purchasing power of the US.
There's little evidence to suggest that higher drug prices actually help the drug companies.
[0] https://www.statista.com/statistics/294631/novartis-revenue-...
The real reason companies don't do it is because Fizz Buzz is a better test than IQ tests.
In a hypothetical world, this decision should not be a woman's decision only. Why don't we have this problem with men?
>>> I don't really know how to solve this problem other than force women to choose between careers and children as they currently do.
Force men to make the same decision?! Why only women have to choose?
At least the graduate can show that he/she can commit to a multi-year long, sometimes boring, project successfully. A high IQ person could just leave your company after 6 months because "they're bored".
No it's not. $7k+ is not a "deal", it's outrageous.
It sounds to me you're classifying people as smart/hard working only if they're successful.
Would you be happy if your electricity provider was free to block access to, I don't know, refrigerators?
Do you? I thought we were talking about OECD studies not "big" countries. My mistake.
I guess it was just a matter of time until "big" came up after "diversity".
>>> We can't come up with tests that accurately compare abilities across cultures in the US. How can we possibly do it across 65 countries.
Well then, let's just give up and not compare countries anymore. /s
>>> You can disagree with the critiques all you want
I'm not, I said that before.
The thing is, when debating, it's useful to think if your opponent has a falsifiable claim. Since you don't, this conversation is useless. I literally cannot provide any evidence for country comparisons, because it's literally impossible from your point of view. So I'm done.
Also, carbs and pure sugars are not really comparable. A lot of carb heavy cultures live very healthy lives.
Irrelevant. You and the grandparent are making an irrelevant point again and again. Why bring up diversity at all?
>>> It also doesn't take into account the amount of difference between cultures. For example ...
I already said there was going to be a "median" example... I was right about that, shocker. /s
>>> The US has a far larger percentage of immigrants than any other country, and from far more countries.
Except Canada and Switzerland and many other countries, right?
Thanks for the criticisms about PISA, never said they weren't any (see my previous comment). I asked repeatedly for alternatives instead.
The criticisms are pretty weak as well.
"In addition, Shanghai schools systematically exclude migrant youth."
If they are migrants, they're not representing the local education system now do they?