viktorcode

It looks like a strike action by the AI drivers.

All the papers that can be replaced with this digital ID were issued by the state.

PCs weren't made "open" by the government regulations. Any company if it wishes so could start selling a locked down Windows machine with no ability to replace the browser. Nobody will call this company "a monopoly" for that fact alone.

That's exactly why markets aren't defined in that way. See judge's notes from Epic v Apple trial.

I disagree with the premise. Supposedly, Carr continues to run Trump's agenda, but then it would banning TikTok for the reason that the social network was used to organise anti-Trump activities during the last elections.

You either operating on an open market, or in the government-controlled market.

As I get it Carr haven't presented any hard evidence, instead linking to the open publications with various levels of research.

Privacy breaking apps must be thrown out. However, this mustn't be decided on the basis of hearsay.

I'm curious, what is your definition of monopoly?

Unlike in Apple's situation, users had the full power of choice of installing a web browser on Windows PCs. They used IE for the same reason people now installing Chrome: it's the browser where the most of the stuff doesn't break.

Your "marketshare" definition is bogus. I could claim that Firefox has 100% marketshare of PlayStation consoles.

There's no such market as devices of a single manufacturer.

Web engines market share: Chromium - 80%, WebKit - 20%

FOSS patents: "Apple apologists seek to defend the Webkit engine monopoly"

Internet Explorer 6 was dominating the web. Was it best too?

I wouldn't call C++ "good" at any of those problems. "Good enough" - maybe.

It does not replace OOP because there are no answers to other questions like: does it support polymorphism? Or data encapsulation? Etc. It's a data access design principle, and that's about it.

Either you are trolling, or you are that singular kind of user site marketers dream about, who actually want to enable push notification and receive their spam.

Please define "best"? Certainly, it's not the power efficiency. Not memory efficiency either. Performance maybe? But then it's very different from test to test. So, what makes Chromium the best?

Not really. Safari had its own declarative content blocker engine for many years now. Additional, it is moving to the manifest standard for better interoperability with cross-browser web extensions.

Yes, you do miss something. There is about a metric ton of various adblockers on mobile App Store.

> a GC can be more efficient than direct heap allocations

Unoptimised, naive allocations perhaps. I'm old enough to still remember when Microsoft used similar line of reasoning to create artificial cases where C# beat C++ performance.

There is Rtings for television, and other specialised sites for other product categories. I don't think you can stick to any general review source and consistently get quality reviews.

Take a note, that node sizes of different factories aren't comparable, because they are measured quite differently. You can only compare TSMC v TSMC, Intel v Intel etc.

The most likely explanation is they never used this launcher themselves. That applies to QA department as well.

In case if you didn't know, all modern Apple lightning chargers are USB-C chargers. It's the cable which is different.

I never got the point of having borrow checker in a single-threaded environment. Can someplace please explain its usefulness to me in that scenario?

You don't have to stream encoded video from the server. It is much faster and simpler to stream game state and have the game clients render it. Esentailly, that's how all the games with "authoritative server" work.

It's new and requires different mindset than UIKit. Many times I was thinking "it must be broken!" only to find out later that I was doing things wrong. I suspect many posts on Twitter follow the same pattern.

My advise is to try it, and learn along the way. After a while the idea of going back to UIKit will become scary.

Same on Safari.

Only he's wrong. He's supposed to be the top expert behind Free Software movement, nobody else can answer that real-life question better than RMS.

An idea that's inapplicable to reality even in principle is worthless.

You are comparing slavery to writing proprietary code. It takes a cult-like devotion to perform that mental leap. Maybe it's obvious in your mind, but good luck spreading this word to wider world.

There was, but only temporarily, as Apple disallowed running every iOS app bundle.