163 karma · joined April 6, 2021
What stood out from the submissions from readers was how many different things make people sneeze.
At the end of this post is a list of user-submitted reasons, and a few I added, I would love to see which apply to you, and you can submit more.
And thank you to everyone that gave feedback and suggestions, and voted on oddities. Keep it coming.
And to nip it in the bud, yes AI helped (is helping) with this.
There are places where men dancing is gay-ish and that deters them. That's an easy answer, but it's not enough because very progressive countries don't do much better on this, by my experience.
I would agree learning to follow in the very beginning can be easier, so that sounds like maybe men don't remain because their job is harder, but I wouldn't agree with this explanation because I observe fewer men showing up for beginner classes, when they don't know their job might is harder (whether or not it actually is).
Maybe men are more asocial on average? I'd be willing to believe that, especially in these times.
A comment above yours comments that this isn't true in Turkey, Buenos Aires, and I would add Paris to this list from experience, and then there's the entire continent of Africa we haven't mentioned and I can't really comment on, but what those places have in common is a cultural presence of dance, often a deep connection to dance where families dance together, maybe mom dances when she's cooking, dance isn't something you pick up as an exotic hobby, it's just that thing everyone does, and maybe you decide to do it a bit more than others.
Every culture with a lot of cultural dance presence would have a different view on this, I suspect.
Some places just have "social dancing" classes, which is a different thing each week, but they might require you bring a partner, so look into it.
If you're from the US, or less commonly outside of the US, line dancing is a non-partner dance, so a group dance. One of my best friends does it and he loves it. Again don't need to be good to start.
The way I read some of the literature is that these may more often map to preferences, so the individual may prefer to see things, when learning, but it might not actually lead to more learning happening.
In dance I would yield that some people can repeat a movement just by seeing it, and others can't, but again I would say that's a learning style, I'd say there's a capacity inside them that is less strong/developed, translating movement seen to movement done. And it can be improved.
And, anecdotally, I have gotten a similar feeling reaching deep enough meditation.
Thanks to everyone!
V1 looked like complete Opus slop, but since I make many little sites all the time I can get it to undo a lot of them, one at a time. I just explicitly tell it the aesthetic to avoid per-element (like the famous left border), and eventually it looks okish.
Edit: Ah and for text, Standard Technical English is a good instruction to give it, but I also told it to be dry and technical, and no embelish or do storytelling. And some manual editing out of cringe stuff still after that.
I've been making this list for years as markdown files with a few sentences and links to wikipedia (or xkcd for his visual field comic), but the site is indeed made with the help of AI.
The first time I did a Vipassana retreat many years ago it really showed me that "oh, right, the mind can get into a veeery different state if given the right environment".
Some might say it's an artificial environment you can't replicate at home, and I agree, but by getting much further in such a dense time, it provided a better anchor for me to know what I'm even trying to achieve in my 20 minutes at home.
But it can be very intense, it's possible it would be too much for someone that isn't in an appropriate mindspace.
I'm a very unserious meditator, but when I sit down I at least know when I'm doing "right concentration" or not, so it's possible to have a direction.
I'm speaking very vaguely, but, you know... it comes with the territory.
Since then, I've wanted to see more graphs that are seemingly going vertical because of AI. But also going vertical downward (StackOverflow) because of AI.
So I found some primary data sources and packed them tight onto this page: https://vester.si/ai-impact/
Now includes data from lots of software things like GitHub, npm, pypi, but then slightly further from that with arxiv, crossref, domain stats (.ai tld as an example), and even US Jobs (BLS has a nice API).
I'm still working on some cleanup with another one or two datasources, but it would be interesting to hear if you know of some other numbers to put on here.
But please no paperclip factory stats.