verve_rat

Yes, a better framing might be that they were negligent in not preventing the attack on a third-party.

They didn't explicitly instruct an attack to happen, but they should have done a hell of a lot more to prevent it from happening.

>youth sports industry

Yup, well there's your problem.

Interesting. I've been working on the same problem (you need stuff at a kid's level, but not aimed at kids, if you are interested in the content then it will be easier to learn): https://tailoredreaders.com/samples

I think I like your solution better than mine, which is basically generating children's books from user prompts.

When you say you generate stories from the films, are you summarising / simplifying the narrative of scenes in the film (to down level the language), or creating something new, just with the vocabulary the film uses?

Or indeed natural language to instruct humans.

If it was easy to specify exactly the behaviour you wanted then we probably wouldn't have contract law.

That sounds like an opportunity for GitHub to clip the ticket for providing a way for those businesses to support those projects more directly.

I know complaining about the site is poor form, but it is really hard to take advice seriously for a site that lets other visitors spam... just general internet things to other visitors.

Cute idea, but it is pretty clear the author doesn't consider practical consequences, so why should I trust their judgement about Tailwind?

Pets.com was only 25 years to early.

And if you squint a bit and stretch some definitions... then tipping culture isn't a million miles away from bribing culture.

What is a tip if it's not a bribe to not spit in your food?

I'm a little disappointed that https://bribes.fyi/bribes doesn't redirect to that support page to be honest.

When I saw the name/tag line I thought this would be a travel advice site, but I like this so much more. Great work.

Yup. In other words, we totally could, but there is no reason to put the time, effort and money into doing so.

Yeah, seems to be the direction the US is heading in. I'm interested to see what the response to that will be from the rest of the governments in the world.

No need for everyone else to cut their noses of to spite their faces.

Not necessarily. A reproduction task as a spaced repetition activity can help embed learning. If you are trying to write that prompt there is no reason you can't refer back to the text book to build the prompt and check the output.

> We have difficulty defining “actual understanding”.

Indeed. C.f philosophical zombies and the Chinese room problem.

The idea that some “actual understanding” (or more precisely, the outward appearance of it) needs a mechanism that includes free will is a bold claim.

Using remote control I will choose a model but Claude will always revert to Haiku for the first turn.

Basic stuff about features that are more than a week old just get no attention at all. From the outside Athropic seems to be a clear feature factory.

And maybe they just wrote a sentence like that because that's how they write. LLMs learned their style from humans, we were here first.

Do you think the US needs all of its current military capacity to just deter outside aggression?

When you read someone's comment there is some responsibility to read the words they wrote and not attempt to attack them for an argument no reasonable person would extract from those words.

But paying the money is less resource efficient than using the waste heat for a productive use. As a general rule we should probably insensitvise good use of resources that benefit the general population.

You know China is busy genociding its Uyghurs population, right?

Their cars are probably better than US ones, but they are not free of the taint of genocide.

Edit: and that's not counting their aggressive territorial expansion in the South China Sea and their threats against Taiwan.

Retired people have had to deal with this. I assume it is less of a problem in multi-generational homes.

I think you'll find America failed democracy.

Yes, compare Czech Republic-> Czechia. No problem typing that out, no problem updating my mental map of the world.

Frankly I dispute that Türkiye can be the English name given it contains a non-English letter.

Oh wow, that's a game I haven't thought about in forever. Thanks for reminding me.

> But in any case you cannot go back to a GUI and not have that problem of GUIs being too restrictive: invariably there shall be a need to chain several simple commands that do one thing and that excel at that one thing and that only become powerful when chained with other commands. GUIs cannot solve that.

But TUIs can't solve that either? The ability to pipe CLI commands together when using a tool non-interactively is orthogonal to what UI is used interactively.

Just because they weren't paid doesn't mean women were not doing economically valued labour. The washing machine is probably the greatest productivity unlock since the steam engine.

Changing the tax system to tax capital rather than labour would probably get you 90% of the way there without great societal upheaval (capital would fight back though).

There is a basic problem with framing though. Why does the labour need to find somewhere to go, but capital doesn't? Why can't the increase in productivity be captured by labour and denied to capital?

None of those are helpful examples we could mimic to figure out how to use the tools.

This reads like a CV, not trying to help or educate.

Agreed. I'm actually excited to hope for a cambrian explosion of IDE experiments.

LLM powered visual diagramming of the code as you work? The ability to edit the diagrams and have tje LLM apply that back to the code? Visualisation of test coverage over the UI you are working on? Allowing you to attach user submitted videos of bugs directly to tests in the code?

I don't know if any of that is a good idea, but I really hope a bunch of people try.

They (Stripe) don't have to be a arbitrator of every edge case, just use the information they have that merchants want to give them and surface a risk signal back to merchants, then it can be up to the merchant what level of risk they are happy with for each customer.

It doesn't seem like an unreasonable ask frankly.