Obviously it means the product contains less democracy than required for many.
143 karma · joined January 3, 2014
Obviously it means the product contains less democracy than required for many.
So, it's in employers' interest to make the salaries transparent, isn't it? I bet the model is incomplete.
Again they don't bother to define what freedom is. Whereas the young people know first hand that "It is difficult for me to imagine what “personal liberty” is enjoyed by an unemployed hungry person. True freedom can only be where there is no exploitation and oppression of one person by another; where there is not unemployment, and where a person is not living in fear of losing his job, his home and his bread. Only in such a society personal and any other freedom can exist for real and not on paper." (c)
Would be nice to read his articles if there are any. He's a journalist after all. Right?
Hm, I had to read the lines three times, slowly, to reconstruct the image the author tried to convey. And this was the first layer. Apparently there is another one inside, but I presume this second layer resembles a Rorschach test: everybody is welcome to see what ever she/he wants to see. That's quite an achievement for those who care about pumping up readers' self-esteem. Especially if the readers see poetry as gymnastics for brain.
Утреннее солнце восходит утром –
Столько соблазнительных вероятий!
Что же ты, девка, ходишь по квартире,
Тапками стуча, пятки печатая?
Что тебе, голубка моя лебёдка?
Поворотись-ка, сними последнее,
В золотое зеркало полюбуйся,
Это и то вперёд выдвигая.
И чу! Я слышу глухое биенье.
Тепло бокам и шея удлинилась.
Ноги не радуют, но белым перьям
Многие подруги позавидуют.
Достаточно сделать движенье крылом –
В животе ухает; паркет остался
Далеко внизу; родные, простите,
Пишите мне до востребования.
– Бессмертная, навеки бессмертна я,
Стиксу не быть для меня преградою!
[1] https://readrate.com/rus/news/luchshie-sovremennye-russkie-s...So, it depends on how you view "western powers", I guess.
I really love them and managed to buy both books with the original illustrations for my kid.
His biggest mistake though was omission of regular 1:1's, annual perf reviews, goal settings from the established HR practices... ah, and "values" of course.
I find it funny that such production is compared with Jackson’s trilogy now.
“The irony of fate” 1975
“Winter cherry” 1985
> ...
> The best way of letting him know that in fact he has asked a question is to say something like: "You have raised a very interesting question". "Your question gets right to the point." "I wasn't surprised to hear this question from you," and so on
Hm.. I hear this from my corporate superiors every now and then during All-Hands Q&A sessions. Better check their background...
EDIT: formatting