It would be nice to have a link with more information about the single photos, at least the exact time and place where it was shot, i can then look for the related events myself.
[spoilers] I like the interpretation, but I wish this were highlighted a bit more, imo the movie seems to suggest that the twin will pay no consequences for her act but only the bad guy.
[spoiler warning]
Just watched the movie yesterday evening and I was also quite disappointed, some of the choices did seem cheap, the twin, the book stopping the bullet, the "punishment" of Miles by the destruction of the Mona Lisa. I think that the movie had some potential, but after the twin reveal everything started going south.
You can login, opt out of the banner and it won't be shown to you anymore.
But to answer the question: because it's one of the few annoyances (and probably the only one) on that website. Other than the one month long banner I personally have no complains, Wikipedia is one of the best websites on the internet imo.
I didn't mean to gender, sorry if it was perceived that way. My understanding is that this is a standard industry term. Anyway, I'll try to use human years in the future.
Saving 820 years is great, but it would be nice to define it better. From the article I not sure if they mean 820 man years in total or man years per year or something else. It would be useful to know how much energy was spent to achieve this e.g. of they spent 8000 man years to achieve this it would change the perspective.
Thanks for the answer! Still curious, how does vim work in Warp? Do you know what process are currently running and then you stop buffering the chars and you pass them directly to the process in foreground? I didn't read the code, but from the article it seemed that you pass the text to the shell only when pressing enter, I think in vi(m) you want to do it the whole time (?). If I want to insert something I just type `isomething to insert<Esc>`. How does this work in Warp? What happens if I put the process in background and then in foreground again?
TO better understand the architecture, how will this work if I want to use the shell in vi mode? IIUC that would not be possible with their setup, right? Warp would need to implement a vi mode, correct?
That's about 0.018% of total twitter user base (assuming total user base = 396.5 Million, 0.018 = 100*70K/396.5M). In relative numbers that's very little.
Thinking the same thing! Volleyball is very structured, there are schemas and tactics basically for every event in the game. Additionally, at professional level the accuracy of the players is quite high so the variability should get lower e.g. the setter will set the ball very precisely and the spiker will attack from a specific position. What it might change is the timing (depending on how high the ball is), but usually the professional games are very fast so that should also simplify things.
It depends on the hardware. If you buy one of the certified machines maybe, otherwise you're in for a painful treat. IMO my requirements are pretty low: i3 window manager, chrome (sorry), a terminal, audio and multiple displays. To be honest Linux is not able to provide a fully working experience for those things.
Such consulting companies are on paper quite well suited for these kind of jobs: you can easily ramp and down teams in a matter of weeks, consultants already have experience with your project, they do have experts in all possible areas. Additionally, usually upper management in both companies already know each other so if you need something why don't you go and ask a person you know about this? I actually think it's almost sells itself.
Accenture & Co. won't tell you though that the experts will only stay for the first week in the projects (afterwards they need to go and honeypot a new customer), and they won't mention that the developers only need to pass a behavioural interview for getting hired (absolutely no code required) and that they have a constant massive turnover so that people stay usually in your project for 3-6 months, or that there is basically no coder that has more than 3 years of experience.
I have some concerns about the future of the OS. It seems that the author in involved in many other ambitious projects (sway, hare, sourcehut...). I am not sure how sustainable it is to keep up with all of them. Anyway congrats for the milestone and best of luck moving forward!!
> 7% (assuming yearly) returns seems a lot, is it sustainable even in the medium term (~3/5 years)? Sorry for being suspicious but it sounds like a Ponzi scheme.
But given that's open source shouldn't it be a bit better? If I don't agree with some parts of the OS I can fork the project and remove some stuff. Given that's open source you don't have to fully trust Google, you can check things yourself. I know I'm probably bring native, but I am hoping to see some changes in the space.
Disclaimer: I made some contributions to Fuchsia and I am clearly biased.
I am not sure why there's so much negativity around Fuchsia. From a technical point of view it's finally a serious attempt to do something new in the OS space. It might not be the right and perfect answer, but it might introduce new paradigms and maybe some fork of the project might be able to provide additional benefits for end users down the road. I know that there are lots of hobby/research projects trying out new stuff, but i think Fuchsia stands out because it might be able to land the innovation and make it accessible for a larger user base.
IANAL so I don't have much experience here, but I am not sure this hits the spot.
I think that an organization like Google can afford the brain power needed to understand many of the the implications of using such a license. There are probably other legal, compliance and liability reasons behind this rather than just lack of understanding.