valvar

That’s well and good, but how are we supposed to evaluate the accuracy of random HN comments without anything resembling somewhat objective metrics? People say all manner of things, and usually it’s contradictory. What heuristic do you propose?

Personally, I’d only meet with those in the triple digits of karma.

TDD is perfect for bugs; codify a replication first, then fix it.

Just leave it at home.

Why wouldn’t inference just keep getting better and cheaper as hardware and algorithms improve?

Try Cerberas

It's hard for SaaS platforms to monetize, that's what's wrong with it

Interesting. I'm also nearsighted, so I've always assumed that I don't need glasses when wearing VR headsets. It's easier to just take them off before putting on the headset (MQ3) and I've not noticed a difference in clarity — but I do experience eye strain and visual exhaustion if I wear the headset for too long, so it might be worth comparing longer sessions with and without glasses.

Nothing's stopping users who want an AI summary from feeding the content into their favourite GPT. But it's not contributing anything meaningful to a HN discussion.

Is there no way to contest such a warrant? What about compensation for the loss of utility caused by the confiscation?

Yes, as everyone knows, you are only entitled to an opinion about software if you are also a successful business entrepreneur without external funding.

Good type systems increase velocity by leaving less room for error, so that you don't have to waste half your time debugging and fixing issues that could have been easily prevented. They also provide helpful structure and an IDE experience (the right values, functions, actions, etc are actually suggested for you wherever you are) that really does speed up development a lot.

There's of course always a trade-off: bad type systems can get in your way with boilerplate that you have to wrangle. But I don't think that's the typical experience.

What are they going to be watching if you don't restrict them, and what will it do to them? Why not just talk about it with them?

Boilerplate

Yes?

I imagine handling cash probably has hidden costs that are comparable to the swipe fees, though.

Is "stupid" really one of the words that the Ministry of Truth no longer permits us to use?

Yes, it's very simple. Just open the app info (by long holding the app icon and pressing the little "i"), then select "disable" and confirm the dialogue. Or did you mean something else?

Why would that be "pretty cool"?

Probably just an honest mistake. But they should definitely look into fixing that.

They were questioning the story, not the intelligence of the farmers.

It certainly has a heritable component. When people say "the way you're born", do they mean something non-genetic? What would that be?

This is why self-deprecating humour can be dangerous. Some people won't get it and will just think you're an idiot.

>It’s in a lot of way like the original Dark Soul whose last half is so aweful I’m not sure the awesome first one is enough to redeem the game.

What are you talking about? I've never heard this take before. I found it fantastic all the way through. Maybe introducing the lord vessel was a poor design choice, but it's a minor fault.

That much good RAM in itself isn't super expensive. So does the rest of the hardware have to be particularly powerful?

Europe does. The US? Not necessarily.

That is indeed true!

The most famous example can be found at the bottom of this page: https://www.alphadictionary.com/fun/tongue-twisters/swedish_...

å: stream

ö: island

i: in

ä: not correct, but used to represent dialectical pronunciation of "är", i.e. "is"

Inspecting a powerplant does not grant you any actual influence beyond powerplant inspection. Defining the ethics of AI will potentially let you influence almost all aspects of our lives.

This is the opposite of mitigating biases.

Which grinders with identical burr sets are you referring to?