A bank that cannot be used in the browser has no decent service.
4,860 karma · joined August 1, 2017
Yeah, a real browser would produce certain patterns and never certain others. So in some cases one could clearly say it's not a human using a browser. But a scraper could also make efforts to mimic human browsing. Mostly the frequency of requests can tell with high probability tell it's not human. But such algorithms might occasionally give false positives for real users, exactly like it has obviously happened for the archive.
What google service are you referring to? Not sure whether the archove uses any of Google's tracking. I have pretty strong blocking of trackers and ads. But the archive works for me.
Tried 4 different domains. 3 of email services of various kind. 4th one my private domain which has absolutely no email reputation because I use it only for internal emails and sending is not even possible.
In the end I dug out some old gmail address and tried to use that.
The error was always the same, there had been suspicious activity from that domain. So the message is definitely incorrect. Well, there could have been suspicious activity from some gmail address, but if they don't allow gmail I guess they don't want many customers.
Yeah, did not cover my tracks. The could easily notice that I was the same one trying to sign up repeatedly with different emails.
Yes, I have worked for 400,000 employees corp, then for a 70,000. For the last 15 years I have staid under 100. The pay is less, but it's easier to look into the mirror each morning.
Which country do you recommend? Offshore on my own boat?
Haven't had time to study the bug and really understand the whole issue myself. Just left it there with the takeaway that local validation is currently not for non-experts.
(Sorry not at my computer. Details rather vague from memory.)
Remains to be seen whether their complicated voting system [1] comes up with a result. I don't dare to make complete predictions, although I am sure that many voters see AI very critical.
https://lwn.net/Articles/1088991/ has all the relevant links. Probably somewhwere there is also a more detailed "neutral" article.
The article doesn't say and I know nothing about India. I could guess consumers are oaying using their smartphones. So Google/Apple duopoly are still the gatekeepers to use UPI making huge profits. Of course using one of the American backends would make their control and profits orders of magnitudes bigger.
Which rules do you think are particularly outdated?
Yes, my employer strongly encourages me to act unethically. And in cases like in TFA I do.
A difference could be that Germany might not have such blocking law as France. At least I have never heard of it.
Seems more entertaining than suitable for real analysis. At least I did not see any collected data. You can just watch what happens at this moment.
From watching it a while I came to the conclusion that adding a new authorized ssh key is a common first step.
The message you obviously refer to as just an educated guess by a forum user who seems to be experienced in email topics. It could be that the guess is correct. It could be hat the consumtants are too overloaded to configure things differently. Another user has that guess. We don't know as long as the provider does not answer.
Should check what it does with branch names starting with a dash.
Of course that wouldn't be a security vulnerability, but a user error. It asks user approvals to execute those things and has disclaimers to check results. Which of course every user does all the time... /s
Don't see that we get rid of either command lines in text or von Neumann any time soon.
It's probably an exception in EU.
That the notice comes every 6 months is just to meet the letter of the original international treaty.
I have a Finnish bank account that use a completely standalone, purely time-based code generator.
Alternatives exist. But with current know your customer requirements it's increasingly difficult to open new ones if you are a foreigner and/or non-resident.