usernomdeguerre

Better late than never?

But I think another perspective is a more dangerous effort to chip away at state responsibility for the process and procedures of voting. Once this is owned or easily influenced by a national institution then a single-party state disguised as a republic becomes far simpler to implement.

The danger here being that our system has relied on decentralized states handling these tasks and thus has not created the guardrails necessary (if ever they could survive a unitary executive theory) to ensure fairness.

If you want this class of LLM error to also become habitual and neutral then fine, I don't, and I think many others don't.

But on reflection I don't disagree it was probably made for similar effect in the era of human software development. That sounds like it strengthens my point?

In any other software it would be an error, regression, bug. And in a human process it would be at ~least something someone would call 'bullshit'.

Is this speed of capability because hacking is almost entirely machine verifiable, thus training quicker/deeper than other domains?

Put another way, i can't write an extractor for Reuters and then point a config to it from my current hister binary?

If every person wants to leave the platform but X person stays because Y person is there, and Y person stays because Z person is there, and Z person stays because X person is there then it's a feedback loop. Each person wants a better solution or platform, but none end up leaving because of the network effect.

Breaking that dependency involves the individual user but can't be overcome by the individual alone. Over time, the network re-asserts itself and monopolizes the connections.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect

Wild that they can break the law, disclose it happened, but not involve any law enforcement at all. If cybersecurity events entail disclosures then the perpetrator should carry more burden if they intend to continue doing business.

Also here's the actual post from Anthropic: https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybe...

And if we think this only applies to academic fields then we're doubly fooling ourselves. They do not have the ethics or incentives to be good stewards of the technology.

I didn't realize they were delaying the 2025 ACS again and it seems things are just going to get worse if things don't fit the narrative of the administration.

They all transit the same wires as all other traffic. Copy them at any regional bottleneck. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A. Additionally, i'd admit that maybe someone(s) at these companies knows. But if we think there isn't any person who would agree to do this then I think we're being naive.

> Their data centers aren't old and they lease a lot of compute...

Again, they transit the same wires as everyone else. Here i'll also add that these companies have been actively courting government relationships (and Anthropic attempting to repair damaged ones), why would they stand on principles here and not any of the other many frontlines they've visibly acquiesced?

I just think it's easier to re-route their traffic than, as you say, touch every single datacenter and its employees in some way.

If anything, Occam's Razor would point to a common denominator with all of them, given it wasn't network-wide, as far as i know.

A humorous double meaning, almost like taking the hat off and putting it back on again.

But seriously I would expect a stronger argument in favor of these changes from proponents like you, something sourced, especially given the trial runs of these encroachments that've been run in a number of red states that haven't found any significant security issues and just turned out to be a waste of taxpayer dollars, time, and trust.

Do your readers a favor and bring something at least as substantive as the article you're commenting on.

I'm sorry but I don't take you seriously.

I do wonder if this is an avenue for console gaming that might be practical in a few years; AI-centric hardware that might be too beefy or expensive for regular users, but can extend new or existing games. Kinda like the expansion paks of old.

unfortunate that the "ALE" design wasn't opensourced (couldn't find a link in their post) but I would be interested in learning more about the design, in particular what sort of data pipeline was necessary from skyrim to give this sort of action flexibility?

It's certainly giving them some benefit of the doubt, but it doesn't seem unreasonable that, say, the EU server and the US backup will in some time be an EU server and an EU backup.