4,759 karma · joined October 2, 2013
This "they need people with clearences" talk is laughable. This is purely lobbying which every government contractor does. They also scooped up 4 former state CIOs. They are playing the game and quite well. This does need to be cleaned up. A company recently won a $500 million DOD contract and months later the women on the government side is now the company CEO.
[0] https://news.clearancejobs.com/2021/02/09/how-many-people-ha...
I'm pretty sure it's any claim. If you want to see something scary request your lexis nexus consumer report.
Snapchat paying them $400 MILLION per year takes care of this issue. That's 1 company. A few jaw dropping others have popped up in S-1 filings.
As far as ads go I personally like the search ones. If I'm searching for BMW car service I want the local shop targeting me not 10 pages of dealers. With that said I wouldn't mind seeing search competition.
Guaranteed someone in that decision chain is a Deloitte partner in the next year.
https://us-west.meest.com/services/service/international-par...
This was international arrivals at LAX August 11 (the worlds third busiest airport):
Yet many schools in the US are still closed.
https://www.ft.com/content/1afbf70b-752a-4a91-8e2a-afc74a8e3...
From Q&A:
> Answer: The provider of the information would need to have approvals to provide the information to DEA and provide it without additional costs or approvals from the original data provider. We would need it to be able to be analyzed outside of the host environment so that we could take the results of the query and create our own reports and dashboards and provide it to the necessary individuals in the field who could use the data for investigative purposes.
So... this information is required to be provided to the DEA by law... but apparently some 3rd party entity is receiving it (I'll bet this is for LexisNexus) with apparently no restrictions on how its used and now the DEA is going to pay a stupid amount of money so they can do whatever shady shit they have planned.
> Crypto’s international business was purchased by a Swedish entrepreneur, Andreas Linde, who said in an email exchange with The Post earlier this year that he was not aware of the CIA’s ownership when he purchased the assets. Export controls imposed by Swiss authorities in the aftermath of public disclosures about Crypto earlier this year have threatened the company’s survival.
If Andreas Linde is not a cover that's pretty fucked up. They couldn't have just run the "business" into the ground?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?469263-1/google-v-oracle-ameri...
How is running a search through a free government database/website proprietary?
I also can't find a single mention of Office which is a "cloud" monster itself.
No doubt the guy is probably not a saint but the article starts with the site being worth "between $810m and $936m." and ends with him pivoting into drug smuggling? according to "xoxgoldenfox"?
https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/about-visa/visa-rules...
Sounds like the NSA who couldn't point to a single instance of stopping any type of terrorist attack/operation despite collecting anything they could get their hands on.