ukFxqnLa2sBSBf6

There has been an explosion in verbose status update emails at my job recently which have all clearly been written by ChatGPT. It’s the fucking emojis though that drive me wild. It’s so hard to read the actual content when there’s an emoji for every single sentence.

And now when I see these emoji fests I instantly lose interest and trust in the content of the email. I have to spend time sifting through the fluff to find what’s actually important.

LLMs are creating an assymetric imbalance in effort to write vs effort to read. What is taking my coworkers probably a couple minutes to draft requires me 2-3x as long to decipher. That imbalance used to be the opposite.

I’ve raised the issue before at work and one response I got was to “use AI to summarize the email.” Are we really spending all this money and energy on the worlds worst compression algorithm?

I consider myself progressive and my main issue with the technology is that it was created by stealing from people who have not been compensated in any way.

I wouldn’t blame any artist that is fundamentally against this tech in every way. Good for them.

You wouldn’t use MAUI to build something for only one platform. You would just use whatever it’s an abstraction over for that platform which in the case of Windows is WinUI.

You wouldn’t expect Trump specifically to know what he is signing or any competent President in the same situation?

I think I finally see what we’re clashing on. Where do you draw the line between “this is a tool assisting me in creating my art” and “here is my AI film I stitched together with 10 Sora prompts”?

The songwriter for K-Pop Demon Hunter’s Soda Pop used AI to help them write the lyrics - fine. The hacks on X calling themselves incredible artists because they can prompt Dall-E - slop.

No, there is nothing artistic about tools that help you modify or organize your prompts aka commissions for all the reasons I already stated above.

Let’s play a game. I’ll pick an artist who hates AI and you reply with an artist that loves AI. Let’s see who runs out first.

https://www.wired.com/story/guillermo-del-toro-hopes-hes-dea...

You were going to claim the “win” on this one no matter what anyone says. That’s one of the features of being arrogant.

I have zero desire to get into a semantic argument over this. That would be very boring and is a poor refuge for anyone trying to have an honest discussion.

It’s not a coincidence that nearly all the people today with actual artistic talent universally despise AI. Meanwhile it’s all the talentless tech bros who won’t shut up about how they’re now incredible “artists” that love AI.

I don’t see prompting an AI as creating art in the same way that commissioning a painting doesn’t make you an artist. In this example, it’s the AI model that is the artist creating the “art”, but since AI models aren’t sentient (yet) then what they create isn’t art anymore than a sunset is despite being aesthetically beautiful.

Your “it’s just a tool” argument is especially ridiculous when you consider that the “tool” can create the same “art” in its entirety without you. It would be like if I googled the Mona Lisa and copy pasted it into Paint and then called myself an artist because I used Google and Paint as my tools.

In the case of AI models anything you can think to prompt is already embedded in the model so it’s not like you’re even creating anything. It’s already there. If you have infinite monkeys on a keyboard prompting AI they can generate every single possible image an AI is able to generate. Where is the artistry again?

Categorizing AI generated media as anything but slop demonstrates a shallow understanding of art.

I went to a concert recently and naturally they don’t let you bring alcohol in to the venue. So I very smartly decided to store the alcohol in my belly before I got there. Security had no idea how hard I bamboozled them.

My apologies, won’t happen again

I’m not sure how many people there are like me outside of this website but there’s not a single bone in my body that wants to use AI for these things.

Buying plane tickets for example. It’s not even that I don’t trust the AI or that I’m afraid it might make a mistake. I just inherently want to feel like I’m in control of these processes.

It’s the same reason I’m more afraid of flying than driving despite flying being a way safer mode of travel. When I’m flying I don’t feel like I’m in control.

I’m gonna barf

It’s a good thing the author provided no data or examples. Otherwise, there might be something to actually talk about.

I have use a system similar to this guy and TickTick is perfect. I even use shared lists with my girlfriend to track chores which is something we implemented recently and works great.

I also have a masters in CS but I still consider myself to be “self taught” to a degree. I didn’t really learn anything in lectures or from my professors. Most of my learning came from doing homework, reading textbooks, studying for tests, exploring the material, being curious, experimenting with side projects.

I’m sure my education was more structured than a developer who didn’t go to school, but I don’t feel like there’s a huge fundamental difference.

Like if you’re only “learning” from what people teach you then how are you going to be successful in software?

Woah

Of all the things I think AI shouldn’t be used for AI is one of them (unless you’re like completely illiterate). Whenever I get a “project status update” and the section header emojis show up I instantly just want to throw that garage in the trash.

I typically just measure ingredients and log it in Cronometer.

Just for calibration what’s your second favorite TV show of all time?

I guarantee computers are better at generating random numbers than humans lol

The article makes some great points about how iOS software is regressing, but it still feels so much better than almost any other software I use on a daily basis.

I’ve only ever noticed maybe like a few actually bothersome bugs in the however many years I’ve been using iPhones which is pretty impressive.

Anyway, hope they get it together. Performance and optimization are a very difficult and very thankless job that might not get you promoted the same way cool sexy feature work does. Such is corporate life I guess.

Never beating the insecurity allegations are you? I don’t know what I did to trigger you but this whole conversation is really sad. The “Reddit level insult” projection is extra sad since I come to this site over Reddit to get away from people like you.

In my personal life I have a lot of health issues (mostly autoimmune diseases) that cause me a lot of pain through out the day. It’s inescapable too so its really hard to cope. Sometimes it’s tolerable other times I’m in a black hole of pain and suffering. But it’s actually heart warming to know despite all my struggles that I’ll never be even half as lonely and miserable as you.

Seriously, grow up.

Likewise

Feeling insecure today?

I don’t think went that hard though? I was just pointing out the discrepancy between what they said and what they mean. Not everyone might know that the marketplace doesn’t need you permission to remove your extensions.

Likewise

It’s a fun idea but the ability gimmick makes me not interested. I imagine it will also quickly be overrun by AI copy/pasters.

There’s a few things I’m not understanding here.

1. Did the benchmark authors not review the issues and make sure the solution was not present in the issue?

2. Are the issues locked after they’re included in the dataset? You’d think they would be immutable for reproducibility.

3. For the agents writing patches, is test running part of their inner loop validation? If they write a patch that makes the test pass, then the jobs done. Or is that validation step kept secret from the agent? I don’t see how unless the tests aren’t part of the repo.

I think this is really interesting, but do you deal with someone who has for example dysautonomia where their heart rate is fluctuating wildly throughout the day?

This is what I was looking for. Thanks!