430 karma · joined April 25, 2016
The DNC was hacked and the emails released to hurt Hillary Clinton and to aid the Trump campaign. It is not yet known if the Trump campaign was involved, but it is a fact that the emails were released to aid his campaign. Here are some links:
Guccifer 2.0 is the hacker involved in the DNC emails.
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/13/politics/guccifer-2-0-democra...
Guccifer 2.0 linked to Russian government.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/03/dnc-lone-hacker-...
CIA director calls WikiLeaks Russia-aided "non-state hostile intelligence service"
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-director-calls-wikileaks-a-...
Wikileaks telling Trump campaign they should give them tax returns so that they don't look so biased for Russia
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-sec...
DNC emails released one hour after Access Hollywood tapes
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/07/politics/one-year-access-holl...
Russia's hate of Clinton is due to the Magnitsky Act, which targets oligarchs in Russia.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-cl...
I think it would need to be integrated into the package management system pretty tightly (or have one of its own) to get all of the shared library dependencies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity_%28operating_syste...
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/magazine/the-agency.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/05/europe-vladimi...
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/10/rus...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2014/05/11/i...
Nowadays, lots of code could be using devm_kmalloc, devm_ioremap, etc which will release the resources automatically when the driver detaches from the device.
1. Much more precise user targeting
2. Direct feedback on effectiveness (did the user click-through or even just linger looking at the content?)
TV and radio seem like very crude tools in comparison.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=radeonsi...
The AMD open source driver is just about on-par with their closed source Windows driver. One of the benefits of Open Source is also being utilized now. Game companies like Feral Interactive, who develop many Linux ports, have been improving the driver's performance for their games.
Maybe this wouldn't have been published otherwise, but I definitely believe it to be genuine.
I suspect it has to do with the kind of things I order, and where I'm located, but Amazon deliveries have always arrived within two days for me (sometimes one day). Exceptions being when I order stuff that is not eligible for prime, but I know that at the time of ordering. Their customer service has also been excellent in my experience.
That said, I haven't had a terrible experience with Google yet, but I've barely used their support. I'll find out soon, because my Google-purchased phone started the infamous bootloop the other day.
I don't necessarily disagree with your thesis [2], but this argument seems strange:
>Neither "enough eyeballs" nor "the right eyeballs" are a GIVEN, even for open source software.
and this argument:
> "Not enough eyeballs" (or "ZERO eyeballs" as he loves to claim) are NOT a GIVEN for proprietary software,
Are you an auditor of proprietary software or something? It almost sounds like you're arguing for many-eyes in theory, but you're saying that it's just as likely to benefit proprietary software? That is pretty bonkers to me. Even the 2-4 reviewers thing seems ridiculous, because open source software might be studied years later. In fact, companies trying to sell software analysis tools often fix bugs in open source software to demo their tools; something that they cannot do with proprietary software.
> Although detection of even deliberately inserted flaws can be attributed to Raymond's claim, the persistence of the Heartbleed security bug in a critical piece of code for two years has been considered as a refutation of Raymond's dictum.
I find it amusing that there seem to be this contingent of proprietary code proponents who insist that Heartbleed was the singular proof against "many-eyes". Since this particular security issue is the one thing that critics always point to, it almost seems like this is the exception that proves the rule[3]. Discussion also tends to leave out that it was discovered and patched by people other than the core developers because it was open source.
Closed source software security bugs don't seem to get pithy names because they're so common. If we're cherry-picking cases, how about Windows XP? Beloved software created by arguably the biggest, most advanced proprietary software developers at the time. There was a period of time when you could not turn a machine on for an hour without it being compromised. Or serious bugs that are trivially exploitable and are known about and not fixed for many years [4].
1. I think reasonable people would disagree with ESR about various opinions he has expressed. You really sound like you have a bone to pick though.
2. There is just as much diversity in open source software as there is in proprietary. I do suspect that truly bad code doesn't get used as much in the open source world as it does in the proprietary world though.
3. All software has bugs, DJB creations excepted. It seems like critics are saying "Ha! See! Open source has security bugs too!" No shit. Of course, in a black and white world, this could be considered refutation of ESR.
4. Not really an exploit, but this denial of service is one of my favorites because of how trivial it is and how badly it crushes old versions of Windows:
http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2010-4669/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00yjWB6gGy8
Edit: formatting.
I have a feeling it's going to be my gateway into more heavy LaTeX usage for all manner of documents. The ability to evaluate code during document generation is a big deal to me.
Where I was, power was generally restored within 24 hours. I don't believe this would be possible if every substation were blowing. I believe people refer to the transformers on the telephone poles failing.
To be clear, I believe that most cases of unintended acceleration are caused by pedal confusion/floormats. Just because that's true of most accidents, that does not mean it's true of all of them.
Maybe it's because I work in the embedded space, but I've seen code written as indicated and terrible code like that is not reliable. It might work 99.999% of the time, but given 100,000 units, and a problem might occur every couple weeks. There is nothing magical about automotive software.
So you're saying that we should let these organizations lie as much as they want, because people lie in your day-to-day life? The people you meet in your day-to-day life and lie to your face are much more limited in the number of people they can influence with lies.
Why shouldn't we make enormously more powerful institutions more accountable for lies?
I happen to have a Vive and have been wanting to get my game engine outputting to it. I am primarily focused on Linux.
It seems unwise of the game maker to purchase a music license that expires. Though, I suspect it was a calculated risk, and that they believed potential sales this late after release weren't worth paying more for. Alan Wake was released seven years ago.
While I don't know of that specific scenario, Stuxnet used a hardware vendor's key to install infected drivers[1]. There was also a Chinese registrar that allowed a customer to man-in-the-middle Google[2]. Depending on how Windows organizes their driver updates, I could see an adversary doing a man-in-the-middle between Microsoft and their target, and pushing a bad driver update.
1. https://www.welivesecurity.com/2010/07/22/why-steal-digital-... 2. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140909/03424628458/china...
Dave Grohl, of the Foo Fighters, ended up going to the hospital because of drinking too much coffee/caffeine.
http://www.nme.com/news/music/them-crooked-vultures-14-12945...