So Google is polluting what it means anyway.
59,947 karma · joined July 21, 2015
So Google is polluting what it means anyway.
> hes never coming over Dario Amodei
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei will actually be joining President Donald Trump for a private dinner at the White House tonight, Sunday, September 27, 2026.
CNBC While it is true that he was noticeably absent from the high-profile state dinner held for Chinese President Xi Jinping earlier this week—which was attended by other major tech figures like Elon Musk and Sam Altman—
Meaning, does it prune out some of the not meaningful path to what exists? It's hard to visualize what they actually get to review.
> . The accepted runs cost $4.65. Failed attempts and replacement runs increased the complete cost to $5.14.
This could be, for example, step one in the return of AMP, but with a new twist. Where google conveniently returns the content of your website, without directly sending the user to your website. With whatever changes it chooses to make.
Or are you saying the Ukraine drone strikes have not affected the output at a scale where it matters globally?
I don't have a great view, though, whether this is even visible to the streaming platforms. I suspect they don't really lose much notable revenue from piracy anymore. While it's matured some recently, it's not as easy as "download limewire".
-g
--grow
Grow (append to) the specified zip archive, instead of creating a new one. If this operation fails, zip attempts to restore the archive to its original state. If the restoration fails, the archive might become corrupted. This option is ignored when there's no existing archive or when at least one archive member must be updated or deleted.Not as far fetched as it sounds even. Plenty of not-quite-a-crime things they could track if desired.
- Eventually the universe of "provably done before" is now mostly LLM genned code. So the training data quality starts a slow decline.
- That it's "good enough" now for 90+% of the work kills the pipeline for any new human software experts. So they never gain the experience and insight to be able to steer the AI to produce ok-ish code. Existing experts age out. This cycles with the bullet above over time. And at some point we're stalled, all code is now mediocre at best and while output is high, innovation/evolution is low. Or whatever innovation we have is coming from a very small circle without much natural competition.
https://www.righto.com/2015/12/reverse-engineering-arm1-ance...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reducti...
Ah, something I needed, but did not know I needed. Comes up ALL the time. I want to know something that is well off the task, but it's the best time to ask due to the specifically loaded context.
$3/$0.30/$15 ( input / cached input / output, all per 1M )