tuvang

There is a deadly game of chicken going on. Junior recruiting already stopped for the most part. Only way this doesn’t end in a catastrophe is if AI becomes genuinely as good as the most skilled developers before we run out of them. Which I doubt very much but don’t find completely impossible.

I get this is sarcastic but getting to know people like that is literally how the field of criminal psychology was born and helped stop many people like Bundy.

In theory, true. But fixes to issues like this are usually done on hardware level in future generations or very low level software level where most people don’t have the knowledge/effort to deal with. Resulting in our editors/games/job tools running slower they can to mitigate security issues irrelevant to our common use cases.

First impressions do count but I think the above poster has a point, a suit can actually harm your chances in an environment where no one wears suits.

I get what you mean by EVs having high cost components but low maintenance is usually used as an argument for EVs. As long as nothing breaks they are very cheap to run in terms of both maintenance and fuel.

I figured it is because most things in nature exist in multitudes, so there being 0 indicates an absence of multitude.

For example: There are trees in this field. There are 0 trees in this field.

Singular is the special case, similar to square x rectangle relation.

Thanks for the detailed breakdown. This is an important nuance to my short reply.

OpenAI has a very healthy revenue stream in the form of other companies throwing money at them.

But to answer your question, no they aren’t even profitable by themselves.

It's not even a dream, militaries are already many orders of magnitude more capable per soldier compared to the past. That ratio will keep increasing at an even faster rate with new technologies like AI.