It's like drawing conclusions about human society based on just watching prison inmates interact.
17 karma · joined May 5, 2021
It's like drawing conclusions about human society based on just watching prison inmates interact.
When both of those are in effect, does jealousy dissipate?
> He and his men would kill the heads of other clans then force the survivors to join their united “super-clan.”
> Each time he conquered a new clan or people, Genghis Khan would [rape] the women, either to himself or to his head chiefs. This is how he acquired enough wives to father the number of sons necessary to provide the DNA lineage which we know today.
Standard infanticide practice for many primate species. Humans just scale better.
> Yet when it comes to the DNA of Genghis Khan and his descendants, we are fascinated at the possibilities and still seek the “bragging rights” of being a part of his incredible family legacy.
Being descended from a mass rapist isn't something to brag about. And let's not gloss over what those women went through.
"The Fantastic Masculinity of Newt Scamander" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4kuR1gyOeQ is a pop culture analysis of the mild-mannered leading man of the Happy Potter prequel movies.
The difference is sex is often intrinsic to the relationship. When someone wants it a lot less or more or different than before then the terms of the relationship unexpectedly become worse for at least one person. That can feel like bad faith even if it wasn't.
Maybe some parts of toxic masculinity are perpetuated more by women and the media than other men.