1,048 karma · joined April 12, 2018
No, it isn't. That sounds strange, right? But here is an explanation what eternauta3k probably meant: In modern physics, there is a kind of consensus that asking “why” has often been inappropriate or even misleading and should be therefore left to philosophers. The real questions are: Does our current model describe all observations? If not, can we find a model that does? And, even better, can that new model make predictions that we can verify?
Well, around two hundred years later they found out that it is not a good explanation (which of course in no way diminishes Newton's achievements).
Not sure what you call a PC, but there are 17 years of problem-solving computer games (text adventures, click-and-point adventures, RPGs, real-time and round-based strategy games,...) before Myst.
I have really learned to mistrust and double check every single line those systems produce. Same for writing code. Everything they produce looks nice and reasonable on the surface but when you dig deaper it falls apart unless it's something very very basic.
Foundation to read this book or for a specific topic?
I didn't know that was the official name. Hence the startup-sequence.
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/352447/how-to-write-...
Which is funny, because the monoliths in the AI video look more eroded than the real ones today.
This looked like a nice idea at first glance. At second glance, it's really bad because you have to assume that everything you see in these videos can be wrong or misleading.
Wouldn't that result in very bizarre memories instead of no memories?
That would be rather 1996. Alphas were already at 500MHz in 1997, and (expensive) Pentium II were at 450MHz in 1998.
In the hm_put function, when you overwrite, why do you malloc and copy the key again, and what happens with the old key pointer and the old value pointer? (no free for the key and the memset zeros everything?)
I don't know any concrete example, but since road engineers have been using queueing theory, originally invented for telecommunication networks, for more than 70 years, I would be surprised if models and tools designed for one use case had not been reused for the other.
Not at all. You need the right type of rice (and a rice cooker helps). There are many options for the filling, some of which don't even require a trip to the Asian grocery store.
At that time, such games were written in assembler, and you had to be very careful to place the instructions for scaling and descaling in the right places, not only to get the final result in the right units (i.e., screen coordinates), but also in intermediate calculations to preserve precision.
Give this man a node.js application with 100000 dependencies where an update from package version 34.2.4 to 34.2.5 breaks everything because the developers decided to change the order of parameters in one function just for fun.
Is that a new hotspot feature? I thought it can only do scalar replacement (avoiding object allocation and keeping the object fields in registers).