85 karma · joined March 4, 2020
So Nike probably got it close ("Just do it."), but I think a more accurate slogan is "Don't think about it beforehand--just do it, y'know, for a little while, unless it hurts really bad, in which case you should stop doing it and consider seeking medical attention."
Suffering sucks. It sucks especially when there's nobody to see/tell about it/nobody cares, no prestige, or sense of moral worth to be derived from it. If I jog by myself, I'm a nobody. If I jog on a team I'm part of a story. I think this is why jogging around the neighborhood doesn't stick. It just sucks, all by itself, and you may even get heckled for it. Nobody cares, and if they do it's for the wrong reasons. By myself I'm not contributing to anything besides my ego.
I think my class bias shows clearly here. This middle-class type of suffering is voluntary...
I was going to write more, but that's all I have for now.
Wow, that's dedication!
> I'm just happy to see how much job security I have
I'm glad for you!
> none of you are smart enough ...
Now I feel bad about myself!
I think you're missing their argument. YouTube censoring doesn't prevent information from being published elsewhere.
Has there been election fraud? What evidence supports this claim?
I'm skeptical because I read this and it sounds like using technology to create a system with even less accountability and whose outcomes, however horrific, will be justified by "That's just how the system works; I don't know what to tell you."
“The bold implication of this idea is that the effects of ego depletion could be undone by ingesting glucose, and Baumeister and his colleagues have confirmed this hypothesis in several experiments.”
Kahneman, D. “Thinking, Fast and Slow”. 2011. pg. 43, para. 2, Se. 5.
Anyways I agree that we need to work less.
My understanding:
Terms like 'modernism' and 'postmodernism' assume that such terms represent meaningful periods of history. If we roll with this assumption, then modernism refers to a collective cultural mood of optimism about the prospect of Utopia, marked by a strong sense of personal agency, derived from the intellect and the technology produced by the intellect. If modernism were a person it would say something like "Now that religion--dogma--is out of the way, I can use my brain to invent things that will improve our lives, and eventually we will live in a Utopia, or something close to it."
In contrast, postmodernism refers to a collective disillusionment with the world, a loss of faith in or a deep suspicion of Utopia, especially w/r/t the intellect and technology, and a consequent erosion of a sense of agency such that the very existence of the Self is uncertain. Postmodernism might stay in bed and say things like "I'm depressed because, while rationality has undoubtedly helped some people, it has also hurt quite a few, on a scale made possible only by the technology I've created, such that it's not clear anymore if life is actually improving at all."
That's the way I see postmodernism. An exercise in humility, it's a kind of moody, self-reflective style of thought that is ruthlessly critical of one's own perspective, intensely vigilant the self's capacity to distort perspective by tending to itself at the center of things, and always suspicious of one's own position in power structures for the sake of leaving no stone unturned in the search for meaning.