634 karma · joined April 28, 2020
My conclusion from the report is that it is still too early to determine the impact of the program.
I think this law is a net positive, but I can't tell from this document if it really made a measurable impact in year 1.
Now that my oldest is 13, I've started to realize that you can only control a portion of this, so sometimes education is better. My setup above works fine for helping my younger two avoid content they might accidentally find. However, every middle school kid can help you kid find a variety of VPN solutions to evade all of this. The latest for my 13 year old was aChrome plug-in that routes that tabs traffic alone over VPN. I unblocked Discord for him in exchange for dumping the VPNs and having a deep conversation over what is appropriate and how to behave on the internet.
This cannot possibly be a serious article. Name one technology IBM has been the leader in since 1995?
"I was expecting more comments about this."
Clearly a post designed to be provocative more than anything else. It's just not that interesting or novel. The idea that certain ideas can't be expressed and by expressing them you're making yourself free is fine, but not that interesting if your only goal is to be noticed.
To me, the most important thing would be assured that this investment truly creates new panel installations vs just being an arbitrage play on reselling existing solar capacity. Is there anything about this program that ensures the solar panels create net new capacity?
(btw - my Mac auto-capitalized "app store" - classic Apple)