The post seems to be gone though.
268 karma · joined January 26, 2014
The post seems to be gone though.
Defending yourself from a person who hits you in the head with a hard object is reasonable (at least in the rest of the world outside of California), shooting too.
This is bizzare. We have Apple/Samsung/Huawei/xiaomi stores on every corner somehow. At least they offer google search here.
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Internet_Defense_Forc...
Well, that's something. Some content seems to be machine-translated and prices are in €, but it indeed works. I wonder why wouldn't they just slap polish domain on it. And why I haven't heard about that.
> They seem to have given up as well... a few years ago the Finnish Google Store sold various Nexus tablets and phones, nowadays it is just Wifi and Chromecast.
"We aren’t in your country yet" I guess I'll get Xiaomi or Samsung again.
Amazon doesn't even have a polish website, as amazon.pl redirects to amazon.de They have multipe logistic centres in my country, employing thousands of people though! I guess it's for Germany so I can buy at amazon.de with international shipping, lol.
We have Uber, McDonald's, iphones, credit cards, the internet, electricity! Come on! Almost everyone buys online here, either native polish e-commerce or directly from China.
Also I think we can't buy any of Google hardware directly. I have given up on them though.
So much for globalization.
For the record it has been like this in Poland since 2016. It is cheaper here, but at the same ratio vs. taxi prices. Also no uber pool here or Lyft at all here.
Edit: this is in Europe though
Tried to book a one of Starwood Preferred Guest hotel. Had to create an account, but this is a given. For a single room there are 12 offers you can choose, really simple /s.
The cheapest offer is for "SPG Member Exclusive. Am I one? How do I know? I guess I'm not, just created an account, but let's try anyway since it isn't disabled. First thing they try to upsell me on a room with 3X price. Can skip it. Now the price is different, it includes VAT. Why would you not include VAT in the first place? You have to pay taxes in Europe. Ok, apparently the price includes 5% discount and a free wifi (wow). Let's try others since 5% is not that much.
Oh, if you click the small link you can see the prices without the upselling attempt. Again no VAT included, but why is this "Save 10 percent - prepaid rate" somehow more expensive then the 5% discounted rate? Maybe this is for non-exclusive people.
On the first sight "Weekend package" offer is just more expensive, no value added. Unlike other offers it doesn't say this in the title, but it includes breakfast.
There is "SPG Member Exclusive: Flexible rate". Still don't know if I'm exclusive enough, but the rate itself isn't flexible (I blame bad translation though, part of the interface is in my language, part is in English). It's just a cancellable offer.
There's also a cancellable offer for non-exclusives such as myself.
Other offers either include breakfast or are some expensive packages.
I have given up, since I don't know if I'm an Exclusive Member. The price on booking.com is the same as non-exclusive one, so really no point in booking here.
Other strange thing for me. Every place on the site mentions some points. Is this an American thing? If you just want to book a room it feels like you are paying a premium, so the points-people can pay less. How I guess it works: you choose more expensive hotel/room to defraud your employer, so you can get more points to use on your own travels. Just a wild guess though.
IHG.com hotel was no better. Again confusing pricing, where what you see first is never the end price. If you choose breakfast, it changes rate but also includes some "Additional guest charge" (???). There's "IHG® Rewards Club Advance Purchase" and also "IHG® Rewards Club" and normal rate. Don't know which can I take.
The 'points' thing here is even more ridiculous - you can pay more to get more points, like pay X more per night and get Y more points.
In the end I booked on booking.com. It was 3.65% cheaper through the hotel chain site if I'm exclusive enough (still don't know). I probably lost some points, but I don't want to be constrained in my travels with some loyalty programs. SPG only has 7 hotels in my country and IHG has 5, so I would have a hard time earning those points. Also I almost always travel privately so can't defraud my employer for points.
So much emphasis on how senior he is, how junior you have to write something so wrong. How OP's career is over. The 3rd point reads like navy seals copypasta but with HR instead.
If you don't see any other way to deal with OP's views than described in this belittling rant, than you are no more senior than he is.
And a minor nitpick about this rant's top highlight:
>Essentially, engineering is all about cooperation, collaboration, and empathy for both your colleagues and your customers.
This is a non-statement. Replace 'engineering' with science, medicine, finance, customer service, politics, retail, programming etc., and it will sound as correct.
I don't know if Amazon has some cheap delivery here in Poland or do they ship everything from abroad.
And I thought that I work in an unprofessional company on a useless project. I feel a lot better now.
This reads like a chatlog from minecraft server for teenagers.
Technically you are right, but this sounds pretty depressing.
At least she didn't make it to the top 10!
So let's assume that voting in compulsory in the US this year, and everyone actually shows up to vote. After the election, results come up:
XX% Clinton
YY% Trump
Z% Johnson
The results obviously would be different if voting haven't been compulsory. That would be: AA% Clinton
BB% Trump
C% Johnson
I fail to see how this ensured that everyone is represented.* regex pattern is controlled by site, while regex input is external
* regex pattern is compiled once, while it is being run for every input
Simple regex (as in formal language theory) are matched in O(n) time by finite automaton.
Extended regex like PCRE are more powerful, but most of the time are implemented by backtracking engines, where really bad regex pattern might go exponential, but even simple pattern as in postmortem can go O(n^2).
Do implementations optimize simple regex patterns to O(n) matching? Even I wrote x86 JIT regex compiler for fun some time ago. Compilation time was really bad, but matching was O(n).
Yes, I am frightened by people attacking political rallies, especially when waving other country's flags. What is so strange to it?
Try to get out of your USA bubble of thought. I live in Poland. Let's say there is a presidential candidate, who dislikes Russia and is in favor of tighter integration with EU and stronger defense on east border. Now imagine that his supporters are attacked on rallies by people waving Russian flags, chanting "Russia" or "Putin". Why wouldn't you be afraid of them? I would want them out of my country.
We can spin it some other way too. For example suppose that after Snowden revelations (top European politics' phones tapped by NSA) Angela Merkel says she won't have any more of this USA bullshit, but her supporters are attacked on a rally by Americans chanting "USA USA USA" (or "NSA NSA NSA") under American flag. Still cool for you?
I don't know, but this isn't the world we live in. For this to work, deflation should be at least 10% (for consumers).
Would postpone buying a smartphone for 5 years, because it will be 5% cheaper then?
* People actually doing wrong things are 'just doing their jobs'. They are also underpaid, with no job security, so only a bad person would make their job even harder.
* Ones who order them are not actually doing anything wrong. It doesn't help that you often can't find the person responsible up in the chain of command.
So it works as intended.
Example problem could be that both JavaScript strings and std::string can have '\0' bytes in them. Converting them like in the post would lead to string truncation if a null byte was present somewhere in the middle of a string.
So it should be something like (error checking aside): v8::String::Utf8Value s(args[0]); std::string str(*s, s.length());
Just because they don't agree with having CoC doesn't mean they do anything CoC disallows. The same with people fighting for free speech or freedom of association - at least one of them is not a hate speech using KKK member.
Nice passive-aggressive personal attack though. Maybe CoC isn't that bad idea after all.